2017
DOI: 10.2737/nrs-gtr-172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How climatic conditions, site, and soil characteristics affect tree growth and critical loads of nitrogen for northeastern tree species

Abstract: Forest health is affected by multiple factors, including topography, climate, and soil characteristics, as well as pests, pathogens, competitive interactions, and anthropogenic deposition. Species within a stand may respond differently to site factors depending on their physiological requirements for growth, survival, and regeneration. We determined optimal ranges of topographic (elevation, aspect, slope gradient), climatic (average temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
(162 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, soil measurements are taken at a shallow measurement depth (30 cm) and mature stand tree roots will be much deeper (>60 cm); this could result in lower effects to the modeled predictions. Additionally, other soil metrics (e.g., soil base saturation, exchangeable calcium), which are not directly available across the full FIA panel, could provide more predictive capability for pH as these will have a direct effect on the acid–base status or calcium status of soils (Robin‐Abbott & Pardo, 2017; Sullivan et al, 2013). Generally, soil conditions were minimally correlated (<±0.4) with other mediating factors so the limitation of our selected soil metrics is likely attributable to dataset constraints rather than multi‐collinearity issues with other predictors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, soil measurements are taken at a shallow measurement depth (30 cm) and mature stand tree roots will be much deeper (>60 cm); this could result in lower effects to the modeled predictions. Additionally, other soil metrics (e.g., soil base saturation, exchangeable calcium), which are not directly available across the full FIA panel, could provide more predictive capability for pH as these will have a direct effect on the acid–base status or calcium status of soils (Robin‐Abbott & Pardo, 2017; Sullivan et al, 2013). Generally, soil conditions were minimally correlated (<±0.4) with other mediating factors so the limitation of our selected soil metrics is likely attributable to dataset constraints rather than multi‐collinearity issues with other predictors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to altitude, topographical variables such as slope and aspect influence the forest composition. While aspect can affect species composition and soil properties --including soil moisture, pH, organic matter content and nutrient cycling--slope gradient can affect soil thickness, water and nutrient retention, among other factors (Gilliam et al 2014, Robin-Abbott andPardo 2017). At this point, the effects of site condition parameters may vary in combination with other variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%