2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do construal levels affect the intertemporal choices of Internet addicts?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
10
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1bHC81 (39)23.60HYP DDVIR, FDR1yBS CONCRETIZATION Main effect conditionC: High-level construal ➔ DD –E: Low-level construal ➔ DD ↓Exp. 2HC102 (35)36.25HYP DDVIR, FDR1yBS CONCRETIZATION Main effect conditionC: High-level construal ➔ DD –E: Low-level construal ➔ DD ↓Li et al (2016)Internet addicts / HC55 (39) / 55 (25)19 / 19HYP DDVIR, FDR6mBS ABSTRACTION Main effect conditionC: Low-level construal ➔ DD –E: High-level construal ➔ DD ↓No interaction effect condition and groupIn healthy control group:C: Low-level construal ➔ DD –E: High-level construal ➔ DD ↓In internet addicts group:C: Low-level construal ➔ DD –E: High-level construal ➔ DD ↓Malkoc et al (2010)Exp. 1aHC102 (–)College studentsHYP FITB3d-10dBS ABSTRACTION Main effect conditionC: Low-level construal ➔ DD –E: High-level construal ➔ DD ↓Exp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1bHC81 (39)23.60HYP DDVIR, FDR1yBS CONCRETIZATION Main effect conditionC: High-level construal ➔ DD –E: Low-level construal ➔ DD ↓Exp. 2HC102 (35)36.25HYP DDVIR, FDR1yBS CONCRETIZATION Main effect conditionC: High-level construal ➔ DD –E: Low-level construal ➔ DD ↓Li et al (2016)Internet addicts / HC55 (39) / 55 (25)19 / 19HYP DDVIR, FDR6mBS ABSTRACTION Main effect conditionC: Low-level construal ➔ DD –E: High-level construal ➔ DD ↓No interaction effect condition and groupIn healthy control group:C: Low-level construal ➔ DD –E: High-level construal ➔ DD ↓In internet addicts group:C: Low-level construal ➔ DD –E: High-level construal ➔ DD ↓Malkoc et al (2010)Exp. 1aHC102 (–)College studentsHYP FITB3d-10dBS ABSTRACTION Main effect conditionC: Low-level construal ➔ DD –E: High-level construal ➔ DD ↓Exp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When temporal distances are larger, events are more likely to be represented in abstract terms that capture their central features (high-level construals) than in more concrete and incidental terms (low-level construals). The studies by Kelley and Schmeichel (2015), Li et al (2016), and Malkoc, Zauberman, and Bettman (2010) tested the hypothesis that higher-level construals could lead to more patient behavior. This hypothesis is grounded in the argument that if a bias to the present is driven by contextual and concrete representations, then endorsing an abstract mindset should decrease the extent of these representations and thus attenuate delay discounting (Malkoc et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high prevalence of delay discounting has been noted among the individuals with opioid (Madden et al, 1997 ) or marijuana (Johnson et al, 2010 ) dependence, and in those with heroin (Kirby et al, 1999 ), and smoking (Ohmura et al, 2005 ) addiction. Such high rates of delay discounting have been observed among the individuals battling pathological gambling (Alessi and Petry, 2003 ) and Internet addiction (Saville et al, 2010 ; Li et al, 2016a , b , 2019 ; Weinstein et al, 2016 ). This notion of high delay discounting rate among the addicts is also supported in research on adolescent substance abuse (Stanger et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Such experiments have been thoroughly described by Freitas et al (2004) and constituted paper-and-pencil tests. This type of experiment has been employed by a number of researchers, such as Wakslak and Trope (2009), Fujita et al (2006), Brügger et al (2016, Ho et al (2015), and Li et al (2016). Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two construal-level conditions.…”
Section: Construal-level Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%