How Do Employees Perceive Corporate Responsibility? Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility Scale

Abstract

This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link

Understanding Internal, External and Relational Attributions in Reaction to Corporate Social Responsibility

“…However, the most common models in the extent literature are (1) the model proposed by Carroll (1991), (2) The stakeholders' perspective model proposed by Egri et al (2004) and (3) the justice perception model proposed by Rupp et al (2006) and (4) embedded and peripheral CSR by Aguinis and Glavas (2013) etc. Despite these models, the conceptualization and operationalization of a single model from the perspective of employees is still at large (Gond et al, 2010;Akremi et al, 2015). Hence, one methodological implication of this study is that a new model of CSR is offered by addressing some of the criticisms in the existing ones.…”

“…While on the quest for an alternative conceptualization of CSR (Akremi et al, 2015), this study attempted to extend the works of Aguinis and Glavas (2013) about peripheral/embedded CSR and the commentary of Vlachos et al (2013a) on the same work. In so doing, an attempt was made to address some key omissions in both of these studies from the extent literature on CSR and attribution theory (Kelley, 1967) and offered an alternative conceptualization of the same.…”

“…There are other authors whom worked on other models from different perspectives too (see Du, Bhattacharya, & Sen, 2007;Matton & Moon, 2008;Peloza, 2009;Rupp, Shao, Thorton, & Skarlicki, 2013etc.). However, authors still stress on the need for further research to develop the understanding on CSR (Akremi, Gond, Swaen, & De Roeck, 2015;Gond, Akremi, Igalens, & Swaen, 2010) because several methodological weaknesses have been reported in these models. Besides, other authors also argued that the actual psychological mechanism through which CSR leads to important organizational outcomes is still unknown (Bauman & Skitka, 2012;Glavas, 2016).…”

“…It will also help in understanding the actual psychological mechanism behind different behaviors that are resultantly prompted at workplace. Almost all previous models of CSR presented earlier have been examined in the past studies in details (see Akremi et al, 2015;Gond et al, 2010); therefore, the main focus of this study is redesigning the model of Aguinis and Glavas (2013) because of its potential implications for future CSR studies (Vlachos et al, 2013a).…”

Brakes and barriers of Corporate Volunteering

“…Glavas, 2012); and a greater commitment by the worker tends to increase company results (Muller and Kraussl, 2011). Thus, CV as CSR activity has a direct and positive relationship with the pride of belonging and the perceptions of the organizational support; and it is related indirectly and positively with organizational identification, with job satisfaction and effective commitment that goes beyond the terms of the contract; and reflects the ethical climate of the company (El Akremi et al, 2015).…”