How do institutional innovation systems affect open innovation?

Oliveira, Rui Torres de; Verreynne, Martie‐Louise; Figueira, Sandra; Indulska, Marta; Steen, John

doi:10.1080/00472778.2020.1775466

Cited by 25 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 167 publications

(219 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We addressed this limitation by interviewing the owners or managers of the companies that participated in the research. They had sufficient knowledge and a holistic perspective of organizational processes and practices and the external business environment [66]. The data collection was carried out through a questionnaire in the form of a personal interview with the owner and/or manager of each participating company (see Appendix A).…”

Section: Samplementioning

confidence: 99%

Technological Capabilities, Open Innovation, and Eco-Innovation: Dynamic Capabilities to Increase Corporate Performance of SMEs

Valdez-Juárez

Castillo-Vergara

2021

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

124

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Currently, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) play a leading role in most of the world’s economies. For this reason, they seek technological competitiveness and improvement of their innovation activities. In this context, open innovation and eco-innovation are important elements to achieve these goals. With this background, the purpose of this paper is to analyze the relationship between technological capability, open innovation, and eco-innovation in corporate performance, testing a structural equation model using SmartPLS in a sample of 684 small and medium-sized companies in Mexico. The main results show that technological capability significantly influences open innovation and eco-innovation practices, not directly in corporate performance, but through open innovation or eco-innovation. Our results also confirm the positive effects that eco-innovation and open innovation have on SMEs’ corporate performance. These results have important implications in the literature on dynamic capabilities that have not been previously tested. For companies and decision-makers, it shows why these practices in small and medium-sized companies should be encouraged.

show abstract

Section: Samplementioning

confidence: 99%

Technological Capabilities, Open Innovation, and Eco-Innovation: Dynamic Capabilities to Increase Corporate Performance of SMEs

Valdez-Juárez

Castillo-Vergara

2021

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

124

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, ref. [6] demonstrated the importance of institutions and national economic systems in explaining OI in different contexts. However, with the growing importance of this issue, the question of how to use indicators to measure institutional quality is also growing.…”

Section: Institutional Quality Indicators and Their Role In Enhancing...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, a number of studies [4][5][6] have found that institutional pressures also shape the extent of the external knowledge search (firms' openness) that firms can undertake and how this knowledge can be captured for innovation; government usually is the entity wielding the pressure. Study [57] posited that normative pressure associated with regulation and institutions positively influences the likelihood that firms will engage in innovation activities, specifically in environmental innovation.…”

Section: Influence Of Institutional Quality On Firm Opennessmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…More so, institutional quality influences firms to open up, to absorb external knowledge for innovation. This is shaped by government institutions, with reasonable pressure through regulation and institutions to influence firm process innovation [4][5][6]. When the institutional quality is high, firms can utilize their capacity, leading to firm innovation performance [7][8][9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Determinants of Sustainable Open Innovations—A Firm-Level Capacity Analysis

Gyamfi

Sein

2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Institutional constraints impede firms’ open innovation. They have been a challenge, obstructing growth and sustainable development. Research on open innovation has shown that the quality of institutions essentially affects innovation in firms. Hence, prior research has made efforts to incorporate the quality of institutions into open innovation analysis. We can use a series of analyses to examine the impact of corruption, the tax system, and other indicators on firm innovation performance. However, developing economies, such as countries in sub-Saharan Africa, represent a specific group of countries that have long been perceived as those mostly deficient in the rule of law, with poor regulatory quality and a great deal of corruption. In these countries, it is also possible to see a lower number of studies, as the inability to obtain quality data to perform empirical analyses can often limit researchers. Nevertheless, employing data from the World Bank’s 2019 Enterprise Survey, this research aimed at exploring the determinants of sustainable open innovation as well as the effect of institutional quality on firms’ capacity utilization and process innovation through a PLS structural equation model analysis. Our research showed interesting findings, such as the fact that the quality of institutions significantly affects firms’ use of OI instruments and capacity utilization. This research also provides for the novelty of the analysis of capacity utilization in an open innovation analysis. The results support the hypotheses that low institutional quality negatively affects firms’ implementation of inbound open innovation instruments, and that there is a strong and positive effect of low institutional quality on firms’ capacity utilization. In addition, we confirm the premise that firms’ implementation of inbound open innovation instruments has a positive and significant influence on firms’ process innovation.

show abstract

“…Knowledge externalities and exchanges (Magalhães 2004 ; Hamdouch and Moulaert 2006 ; González-López 2011 ; Rolfstam 2012 ; Berraies et al 2015 ; Vines et al 2015 ; Chittoor et al 2015 ; Sein-Echaluce et al 2017 ; Boudreaux 2017 ; Salandra 2018 ; Liao 2018 ; d’Agostino and Scarlato 2019 ; Torres de Oliveira et al 2020 )…”

Section: Management Priorities For Institutional Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic review of institutional innovation literature: towards a multi-level management model

AlMalki

Durugbo

2022

Manag Rev Q

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Institutional innovation creates smart institutions that idiosyncratically thrive in a world of exponential change. Through policy-driven interventions and experiential learning, managers of institutions become adept at delivering praxis- and crisis-driven innovations required for survival and success. Similarly, the management of institutional innovation remains an interest in research due to links of this form of innovation to economic growth, and the demands of on-going major socioeconomic transformations due to technological advances, increased occurrences of major crises, and emerging socioeconomic challenges. Accordingly, a key question arising from the literature concerns the range of determinants and priorities that influence institutional innovation for delivering society value. Thus, the onus is on scholarship to capture and advance knowledge for harnessing the potency of institutional innovation. The purpose of this article is to analyse the current state of research on institutional innovation. Using the systematic review methodology, we identify and critically appraise 485 peer-reviewed scientific publications between 1969 and 2021. The review finds key determinants and management priorities with a view to developing a multi-level management model of institutional innovation. Guided by insights from the review, the article sets a research agenda for future management studies of institutional innovation.

show abstract

How do institutional innovation systems affect open innovation?

Cited by 25 publications

References 167 publications

Technological Capabilities, Open Innovation, and Eco-Innovation: Dynamic Capabilities to Increase Corporate Performance of SMEs

Technological Capabilities, Open Innovation, and Eco-Innovation: Dynamic Capabilities to Increase Corporate Performance of SMEs

Determinants of Sustainable Open Innovations—A Firm-Level Capacity Analysis

Systematic review of institutional innovation literature: towards a multi-level management model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About