How does natural resource dependence influence carbon emissions? The role of environmental regulation

Li, Jiaman; Dong, Kangyin; Wang, Kun; Dong, Xiucheng

doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103268

Cited by 79 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To combat environmental degradation, integrated policies must promote sustainable resource management, reduce pollution, conserve ecosystems, and moderate climate change. This will ensure future generations can access and use natural resources [ 66 ]. Financial globalization boosts economic progress by increasing capital flows and trade, but it also encourages unsustainable resource use and weakens environmental restrictions [ 67 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Financial globalization and economic growth amid geopolitical risk: A study on China-Russia far East federal district

Wang,

Sibt-e-Ali

2024

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Financial globalization and economic growth amid geopolitical risk: A study on China-Russia far East federal district

Wang,

Sibt-e-Ali

2024

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Moreover, natural resources have mixed effects on CO 2 emissions, according to current research. Natural resources have been shown to increase CO 2 emissions (Hussain et al, 2020;Tauseef et al, 2021;Agboola et al, 2021;Caglar et al, 2022;Li et al, 2023), while others have found that natural resources can decrease CO 2 emissions (Khan et al, 2020;Azam et al, 2023). The study of Sarkodie and Strezov (2018) underlined that natural resources are exploited more intensively and environmental sustainability is negatively affected by rapid economic development.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does resource efficiency matter for environmental quality in Canada?

Kirikkaleli,

Castanho,

Deniz Özbay

et al. 2023

Front. Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to combat climate change, the OECD emphasized the need to minimize the environmental impact of material use, as well as promote resource efficiency and accelerate the creation of a circular economy. The present study objects to promote a new debate about Canadian environmental quality and resource efficiency. In other words, this paper aims to capture the effect of resource efficiency on environmental quality in Canada while controlling financial development, economic growth, and energy. Nonlinear ARDL bounds test results indicate the significant long-run linkage between environmental quality, resource efficiency, financial development, economic growth, and energy in Canada. Moreover, the asymmetric results underline that 1) resource efficiency mitigates environmental degradation; 2) economic growth and energy uses in Canada significantly increase consumption-based CO2 emissions; 3) financial development positively contributes to environmental stability. Therefore, policymakers in Canada make sure that circular economies and resource efficiency can help reach net zero and combat climate change.

show abstract

“…As the nation participates in global supply chains, understanding how globalization molds the United Kingdom's ecological footprint has become a critical dimension of sustainable policymaking. Furthermore, the United Kingdom's active pursuit of harnessing combustible renewables and waste resources has emerged as a promising strategy for mitigating carbon emissions and enhancing resource efficiency, as highlighted by Alola and Adebayo (2019) and Li et al (2023). These resources encompass many sustainable energy alternatives, including biomass and fuels derived from waste materials.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The symbiotic effects of energy consumption, globalization, and combustible renewables and waste on ecological footprint in the United Kingdom

Eweade,

Akadiri,

Olusoga

et al. 2024

Natural Resources Forum

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to investigate the effects of energy consumption, globalization, and combustible renewable waste consumption on the ecological footprint in the United Kingdom. The study utilizes data from 1970 to 2015 using econometrics techniques, including the Fourier autoregressive Distributive Lag (Fourier ADL) co‐integration test, autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL), and co‐integrating regression. The results of the Fourier ADL and ARDL bounds tests indicate a long‐term relationship among the variables examined. The outcomes of the ARDL model and co‐integrating regression tests demonstrate that globalization, energy consumption, and economic growth contribute positively to the ecological footprint. However, there is a negative impact of combustible renewable waste on the ecological footprint. Furthermore, the gradual shift causality test identifies a one‐way causal relationship between the ecological footprint and the investigated variables. The study acclaims that the British government should prioritize implementing policies to transition to sustainable and renewable energy sources.

show abstract

How does natural resource dependence influence carbon emissions? The role of environmental regulation

Cited by 79 publications

References 48 publications

Financial globalization and economic growth amid geopolitical risk: A study on China-Russia far East federal district

Financial globalization and economic growth amid geopolitical risk: A study on China-Russia far East federal district

Does resource efficiency matter for environmental quality in Canada?

The symbiotic effects of energy consumption, globalization, and combustible renewables and waste on ecological footprint in the United Kingdom

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About