How governance influences the components of sustainable urban development?

Rasoolimanesh, S. Mostafa; Badarulzaman, Nurwati; Abdullah, Aldrin; Behrang, Mohsen

doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117983

Cited by 27 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This effort is in line with SDG's 11th goal of "urban housing and housing that is inclusive, safe, resilient to disasters, and sustainable." In these circumstances, the local governments' role in implementing SDG is very strategic [69][70][71].…”

Section: Gos Revitalization For Livable Citiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Model in Improving the Quality of Green Open Space (GOS) to Create a Livable City

Wikantiyoso¹,

Suhartono²,

Galih³

et al. 2022

Corporate Social Responsibility

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainable urban development leads to the creation of livable cities. The Green Open Space (GOS) of City requires the quality of life requirements to support the ecological, socio-cultural, and urban economic functions. In Indonesia, the provision of GOS is the city government’s responsibility, which has to carried out transparently and implemented with the involvement of stakeholders. The limited funding for the provision and improvement of the quality of GOS by the city government has developed a CSR scheme from the private sector. This CSR governance model enriches the use of CSR in addition to social assistance or charity activities, which can realize for the wider city community. The city government’s role in using CSR models is significant to ensure transparency of costs, accountable design policies, and their implementation and maintenance.

show abstract

Section: Gos Revitalization For Livable Citiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Model in Improving the Quality of Green Open Space (GOS) to Create a Livable City

Wikantiyoso¹,

Suhartono²,

Galih³

et al. 2022

Corporate Social Responsibility

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In order to meet governance demand, governments establish a supply and demand relationship of public goods. [61,62] Create Under the authority of the government, citizens and enterprises create public value for themselves and the community. [63] Learn Bottom-up innovation and co-evolution of self-organized networks of organizations.…”

Section: Servementioning

confidence: 99%

Holistic Governance for Sustainable Public Services: Reshaping Government–Enterprise Relationships in China’s Digital Government Context

Ding

2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The notion of holistic governance was originally proposed to make up for the fragmentation of public service provision. However, such a notion also has a great potential to be transferred and understood in the digital government context in China, where there is an increasing need to reshape the landscape of government–enterprise relationships that can enable enterprises to involvement effectively in holistic governance, or the planning and design of public services. However, previous empirical studies on holistic governance have neglected the question of how to make this happen. The aim of this article is to fill these gaps, building on holistic governance theory, this article offers a theoretical framework for government–enterprise relationships under the holistic governance paradigm. The framework identifies a comprehensive set of relationships that explain how these relationships affect enterprises’ participation in public service provision. The empirical analysis is based on case studies of four e-services cooperation programs in China. We report three main findings. First, economic incentive should be developed in combination with a holistic governance strategy in order to encourage policymakers to reshape government–enterprise relationships. Second, it seems that the implementation of holistic governance is more effective when complemented with a managerial strategy in relation to organizational transformation. Finally, trust-building between governments and enterprises plays a pivotal role in nurturing the holistic governance paradigm. These findings have important policy implications for efforts to promote enterprise participation and cross-sector solutions to fragmented public service provision.

show abstract

“…Achieving these goals, however, requires an understanding of the complex interaction between the social, economic, environmental, and the urban development components of MP11 (Sachs, 2015). Cities across the developing world should be improved and inequalities reduced (Rasoolimanesh, Badarulzanan, Abdullah, & Behrang, 2019). In addition, these developments should avoid environmental distress, drawing upon the natural capital of the city's resources while promoting the advancement of various social groups, especially the poor (Abu-Ghazalah, 2008; Sachs, 2012).…”

Section: Sustainable Urban Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Following the 2012 Rio+20 conference, several UN members states have moved to propose a number of sustainability objectives looking forward to 2030 (Rasoolimanesh et al, 2019). These SDGs were subsequently adopted at the 70th Assembly of the UN in 2015.…”

Section: Sustainable Development Goal 11 (Sdg11)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The environmental sustainability dimension covers the environmental protection pillar of SUD and includes indicators used to ensure the protection of the urban environment. The urban governance and legislation dimension is concerned with the notion of good governance and includes indicators used to measure the level of urban governance in cities(Rasoolimanesh et al, 2019; United Nations Human Settlements Programme, 2017)…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Inclusion Of Urban Sustainability Pillars In 11th Malaysian Plan Using Cpi Framework

Behrang¹

2019

The European Proceedings of Multidisciplinary Sciences

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The global pace of urbanisation is increasing rapidly. Nevertheless, without considering the pillars of sustainability, such rapid urbanisation might be a negative force for development. The goal of urban development is sustainability, ensuring that a state of ongoing development. Malaysia is dedicated to supporting and implementing the Sustainable Development Agenda 2030. The aim of this study is to explore the integration of the sustainable urban development pillars-social development, economic development and environmental protection-with respect to the current Malaysian plan. This study employs a qualitative approach, using content analysis to evaluate the 11th Malaysian Plan (MP11) against the themes and subthemes and indicators of the City Prosperity Index (CPI). The CPI is a powerful tool for measuring city sustainability, helping countries and cities to identify, quantify, evaluate, monitor and report on progress made toward achieving Sustainable Development Goal 11 (SDG 11) and one compliance with the New Urban Agenda (NUA).

show abstract

How governance influences the components of sustainable urban development?

Cited by 27 publications

References 24 publications

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Model in Improving the Quality of Green Open Space (GOS) to Create a Livable City

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Model in Improving the Quality of Green Open Space (GOS) to Create a Livable City

Holistic Governance for Sustainable Public Services: Reshaping Government–Enterprise Relationships in China’s Digital Government Context

Inclusion Of Urban Sustainability Pillars In 11th Malaysian Plan Using Cpi Framework

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About