How Is Vaping Framed on Online Knowledge Dissemination Platforms?

Chen, Keyu; Yiwen, Shi,; Luo, Jun; jiang, joyce; Yadav, Shweta; Choudhury, Munmun De; KhudaBukhsh, Ashiqur R.; Babaeianjelodar, Marzieh; Altice, Frederick L.; Kumar, Navin

doi:10.1007/978-3-031-17114-7_7

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We also noted that some participants switched to e-cigarettes during lockdown, perhaps due to lack of combustible cigarette availability. We suggest the possible effect of the lockdown promoting tobacco harm reduction (Chen et al, 2022).…”

Section: (Participant 14 45 Years Old)mentioning

confidence: 86%

Substance use and substance use disorders in relation to COVID-19: qualitative experiences of people who use drugs in Jordan

Wazaify,

AlZyoud,

Shahin

et al. 2024

Journal of Substance Use

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundMonitoring substance use and Substance Use Disorders (SUD) during global pandemics is essential, as individuals who engage in such activities may be at greater risk for infections as well as economic and social complications. This study aimed to describe the impact of COVID-19 on substance use and SUD, any changes that occurred in patterns of use, and services provided, the main challenges faced and if and how they had been overcome. MethodsA qualitative study consisting of face-to-face semi-structured interviews with a sample of SUD patients from 3 main addiction treatment centres in Jordan. Recruitment stopped once data saturation was reached. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using NVivo-R1 software, and thematic analysis was undertaken. ResultsA total of 17 individuals were interviewed (male, aged 19-52 years). Five key themes emerged from a narrative analysis: Impact of COVID-19 on the availability of substances, 3 the pattern of use, social life and its relation to SUD, impact on tobacco smoking, and finally on the user's health, awareness and hygienic measures. ConclusionsThis study provided in-depth information to inform, support, and customize the design of interventions to mitigate the negative effects of substance use and SUD-related outcomes in a rapidly changing pandemic.

show abstract

Section: (Participant 14 45 Years Old)mentioning

confidence: 86%

Substance use and substance use disorders in relation to COVID-19: qualitative experiences of people who use drugs in Jordan

Wazaify,

AlZyoud,

Shahin

et al. 2024

Journal of Substance Use

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Vaping seems to have evolved away from mimicking smoking to being a related but separate practice with its own rituals and subculture. Our work is central to understanding how vaping frames differ across online platforms, 27,28 thus allowing stakeholders to intervene around vaping frames and to design communication campaigns that improve the way society sees vaping, possibly aiding smoking cessation and reducing youth vaping.…”

Section: Examples Ofmentioning

confidence: 99%

Online platforms' framing around vaping

Kumar

Chen

et al. 2022

Drug Testing and Analysis

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we provide a descriptive overview of how vaping is framed differently between various online platforms (Wikipedia, Quora, Medium, Reddit, Stack Exchange, wikiHow, Facebook, and online news media). We provide an overview of >1 million posts and news articles about vaping to study the differences in framing between online platforms. Findings indicate an inconsistent framing around vaping across platforms. Stakeholders may utilize our findings to intervene around the framing of vaping and may design communications campaigns that improve the way society sees vaping, possibly aiding smoking cessation and reducing youth vaping.

show abstract

Interventions to mitigate vaping misinformation: protocol for a scoping review

Kumar

Hampsher²,

Walter³

et al. 2022

Syst Rev

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The impact of misinformation about vapes’ relative harms compared with smoking may lead to increased tobacco-related burden of disease. To date, no systematic efforts have been made to chart interventions that mitigate vaping-related misinformation. We plan to conduct a scoping review that seeks to fill gaps in the current knowledge of interventions that mitigate vaping-related misinformation. Methods A scoping review focusing on interventions that mitigate vaping-related misinformation will be conducted. We will search (no date restrictions) MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, Global Health, ERIC, and Sociological Abstracts. Gray literature will be identified using Disaster Lit, Google Scholar, Open Science Framework, governmental websites, and preprint servers (e.g., EuropePMC, PsyArXiv, MedRxiv, JMIR Preprints). Study selection will conform to Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual 2020 Methodology for JBI Scoping Reviews. Only English language, original studies will be considered for inclusion. Two reviewers will independently screen all citations, full-text articles, and abstract data. A narrative summary of findings will be conducted. Data analysis will involve quantitative (e.g., frequencies) and qualitative (e.g., content and thematic analysis) methods. Where possible, a single effect size of exposure to the mitigation of vaping-related misinformation will be calculated per sample. Similarly, where possible, each study will be coded for moderating characteristics to find and account for systematic differences in the size of the effect or outcome that is being analyzed. Quality will be appraised with the study quality assessment tools utilized by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Findings will be subjected to several different publication bias tests: Egger’s regression test, Begg and Mazumdar’s ran correlation test, and generation of a funnel plot with effect sizes plotted against a corresponding standard error. Discussion Original research is urgently needed to design interventions to mitigate vaping-related misinformation. The planned scoping review will help to address this gap. Systematic review registration Open Science Framework osf/io/hy3tk.

show abstract

How Is Vaping Framed on Online Knowledge Dissemination Platforms?

Cited by 3 publications

References 5 publications

Substance use and substance use disorders in relation to COVID-19: qualitative experiences of people who use drugs in Jordan

Substance use and substance use disorders in relation to COVID-19: qualitative experiences of people who use drugs in Jordan

Online platforms' framing around vaping

Interventions to mitigate vaping misinformation: protocol for a scoping review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About