How Social Impressions Affect Public Acceptance of Nuclear Energy: A Case Study in China

Abstract

Expanding the proportion of nuclear energy to shift the current energy structure and reduce carbon emission has been acknowledged by the China National Energy Administration. As a typical NIMBY facility, nuclear power plants are faced with a dilemma. Increasing the public acceptance of nuclear power is important for its development. Although multiple studies have shown the factors affecting the public acceptance, few of them focused on the effects of social impression brought about by nuclear power on public attitudes. In this study, a theoretical model was established to examine the impact of social impression (including impression management and stigmatization), knowledge, social trust, perceived risk, and perceived benefit on the public acceptance of nuclear energy. The data in this study were obtained through a questionnaire survey (N = 577) of residents near the Fangchenggang Nuclear Power Plant in China. The results showed that impression management did not directly affect the acceptance but had a positive effect on knowledge. Knowledge and perceived risk or perceived benefit play roles as chain intermediaries between impression management and public acceptance. Stigmatization negatively affects the social trust and public acceptance of nuclear energy. Social trust and perceived risk or perceived benefit act as chain intermediaries between stigmatization and public acceptance. The path “impression management affects knowledge, and knowledge affects perceived risk, then perceived risk finally affects public acceptance” is optimal among all the paths. Moreover, knowledge has no significant effect on public acceptance but negatively affects perceived risk. Social trust positively affects perceived benefit and public acceptance. It is also indicated that perceived benefit has a stronger effect on public acceptance than perceived risk. The findings in this study could inform the government regarding potential social management and recommendations on policy making.

Large Eddy Simulation of the Inlet Cross-Flow in the CiADS Heat Exchanger Using the Lattice Boltzmann Method

“…It is considered a strategic choice to solve the future energy supply and ensure sustainable economic and social development; see Clulow [2]. According to Drace [3] and Yang [4], The lack of public awareness of nuclear energy has resulted in a low level of acceptance of nuclear energy. The accelerator-driven subcritical system (ADS) drives subcritical reactors with high energy provided by the accelerator to produce high-throughput and broad-spectrum spallation neutrons, which will not create criticality accidents in the common critical reactors.…”

Study on Fuel Selection for a Long-Life Small Lead-Based Reactor

“…As a new energy source, the rational use of nuclear energy is crucial to the sustainable development of the economy. At present, because little is known by the public about nuclear energy, often leading to panic, it is very important to encourage ordinary people to accept nuclear energy, which is a problem that should be solved on the road to popularizing nuclear energy [3,4]. Small reactors have several outstanding advantages: a short construction period and low construction cost; a smaller one-time investment fund; and high flexibility.…”