2000
DOI: 10.1080/05775132.2000.11472169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How the National Science Foundation Funds Research in Economics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of Wachtel (2000) suggests that success in obtaining NSF research support is correlated with past success. This introduces a bias based on past success.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The analysis of Wachtel (2000) suggests that success in obtaining NSF research support is correlated with past success. This introduces a bias based on past success.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The fact that minority status reduces the likelihood of receiving NSF support raises troubling concerns about possible bias in the manner in which the NSF awards research support. Wachtel (2000) for example, has recently provided evidence that since 1974, NSF research support has been disproportionately awarded to economics faculty at fifteen top tier research universities. This suggests that the NSF award process is not unbiased in that the distribution of awards is skewed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Aggregate descriptions of the sort noted above are helpful in sketching the broad outlines of federal research support, but because they combine data on funding across a broad range of scientific disciplines they cannot yield much insight about the factors influencing the patterns that they describe. Wachtel (2000) has analyzed the distribution of the National Science Foundation's funding of economics research. Given that economics funding has been concentrated among a few institutions, he argued that funding decisions are not being made objectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%