2020
DOI: 10.3390/quantum2030030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Avoid Absolute Determinismin Two Boundary Quantum Dynamics

Abstract: Arguments for a two boundary theory are briefly outlined. Plausible concepts of how in such a theory an approximate causal macroscopic theory can emerge are presented. A problem with simple implementations of the two boundary theory is that effective or real willful decisions can not be added as there is no consecutive macroscopic time ordering. In this letter, we present a somewhat drastic but beautiful way to avoid it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is intrinsically somewhat less deterministic than the usual two boundary interpretations [11]. What happens at a time τ 1 = t and τ 2 = 2t f − t affects the evolution in between, including the "final" t f state.…”
Section: Two Boundary Quantum Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is intrinsically somewhat less deterministic than the usual two boundary interpretations [11]. What happens at a time τ 1 = t and τ 2 = 2t f − t affects the evolution in between, including the "final" t f state.…”
Section: Two Boundary Quantum Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is a simple, natural way to select a path according to Equation ( 15) [23], avoiding random selection. If desired, it can be easily amended to include free will decisions [29].…”
Section: Seemingly-random-choice Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantum-times τ −1 and τ 1 are chosen in a way that in the in-between region, the extensive system of witnesses matching in the extremely extended region at τ 0 keep ψ(2τ 0 − τ) and ψ * (τ) sufficiently close to maintain the usual prediction. Eventually, the different "initial" states < i | =< ψ(τ −2 ) | and | i >= |ψ(τ 2 ) > will yield ψ(2τ 0 − τ) = ψ * (τ) leading to visible CPT violations [29].…”
Section: The Surjection View Of the Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%