Highlights Valve replacements using mechanical prostheses are not inferior, and sometimes even advantageous to bioprostheses in terms of transvalvular hemodynamics and left ventricle reverse remodeling;During the average follow-up period, a significantly lower average pressure gradient and a higher effective opening area were recorded in the group undergoing neocuspidization with autologous pericardium compared to other types of implants;Despite the obvious hemodynamic advantages of transcatheter aortic valve replacement, the midterm follow-up has revealed significant residual aortic regurgitation, which is highly undesirable. AbstractCurrently, there are not enough data on the comparative analysis of echocardiographic outcomes, especially in regards to the state of the left ventricle in the long term after different aortic valve interventions. In this review, we present up-to-date literature data (publications published over 20 years) concerning echocardiographic outcomes after different aortic valve replacements. For the search of publications, the authors used international databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, Pubmed and Cochrane. The search keywords were: “aortic valve surgery”, “long-term period”, “echocardiographic outcomes”, “quality of life”. The analysis includes only comparative randomized, prospective or retrospective studies. A comparison between mechanical and biological prostheses has demonstrated that mechanical valves, in addition to displaying higher durability, can be advantageous in certain situations to bioprostheses in relation to transvalvular hemodynamics and reverse left ventricle remodeling. Regarding the comparison of stentless and stented bioprostheses with respect to peak transvalvular gradients and the effective orifice area, an obvious advantage was observed in the stentless bioprosthesis group. The majority of randomized clinical trials have showed great hemodynamic advantages of the Ross procedure in comparison with other types of aortic valve replacement, and an increase in the number of participants (due to future trials) may demonstrate even greater statistical significance. We have found only one publication that presents data on the comparison of the mid-term hemodynamic outcomes of neocuspidization of the aortic valve using autologous pericardium with other types of interventions. With an average follow-up period of 426±270 days, a significantly lower average pressure gradient and a higher effective orifice area were recorded in the neocuspidization group. Despite hemodynamic benefits of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the mid-term period after surgery, the results of postoperative monitoring show significant residual aortic regurgitation, which is highly undesirable.
