2017
DOI: 10.1504/ajfa.2017.086102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to explain accounting manipulations using the cognitive mapping technique? An evidence from Tunisia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To sumup, the final data contains 63 individual matrices. The aim of the questionnaire is then to build the perception maps (Lajnef et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To sumup, the final data contains 63 individual matrices. The aim of the questionnaire is then to build the perception maps (Lajnef et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since individual maps denote individual thinking, collective map is used to understand the group thinking. The aggregation map aimed to show the point of similarities and differences between individuals (Lajnef et al, 2017 ). The cognitive map has formed essentially by two elements: concepts (variables) and links (relations between variables).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, it seems that non-financial information can largely increase the probability that auditors can succeed to detect fraud management. Firms also are invited to improve the structure of their internal corporate governance mechanisms in order to reduce the fraud management and to facilitate the mission of auditors regarding the fraud detection [18]. In fact, the role of corporate governance can largely increase the rationality degree of all financial decisions including the quality of annual report [19] and [20].…”
Section: Managerial Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%