How to Search, Write, Prepare and Publish the Scientific Papers in the Biomedical Journals

Masic, Izet

doi:10.5455/aim.2011.19.68-79

Cited by 56 publications

(111 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

110

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Because of this uneven distribution it is impossible to estimate the IF on the basis of a single article or author (1, 5). …”

Section: Scientometricsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Plagiarism in Scientific Research and Publications and How to Prevent It

Masic¹

2014

Mater Sociomed

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Quality is assessed on the basis of adequate evidence, while best results of the research are accomplished through scientific knowledge. Information contained in a scientific work must always be based on scientific evidence. Guidelines for genuine scientific research should be designed based on real results. Dynamic research and use correct methods of scientific work must originate from everyday practice and the fundamentals of the research. The original work should have the proper data sources with clearly defined research goals, methods of operation which are acceptable for questions included in the study. When selecting the methods it is necessary to obtain the consent of the patients/respondents to provide data for execution of the project or so called informed consent. Only by the own efforts can be reached true results, from which can be drawn conclusions and which finally can give a valid scholarly commentary. Text may be copied from other sources, either in whole or in part and marked as a result of the other studies. For high-quality scientific work necessary are expertise and relevant scientific literature, mostly taken from publications that are stored in biomedical databases. These are scientific, professional and review articles, case reports of disease in physician practices, but the knowledge can also be acquired on scientific and expert lectures by renowned scientists. Form of text publications must meet standards on writing a paper. If the article has already been published in a scientific journal, the same article cannot be published in any other journal with a few minor adjustments, or without specifying the parts of the first article which is used in another article. Copyright infringement occurs when the author of a new article, with or without mentioning the author, uses a substantial portion of previously published articles, including past contributions in the first article. With the permission of the publisher and the author, another journal can re-publish the article already published. In that case, that is not plagiarism, because the journal states that the article was re-published with the permission of the journal in which the article is primarily released. The original can be only one, and the copy is a copy, and plagiarism is stolen copy. The aim of combating plagiarism is to improve the quality, to achieve satisfactory results and to compare the results of their own research, rather than copying the data from the results of other people's research. Copy leads to incorrect results. Nowadays the problem of plagiarism has become huge, or widespread and present in almost all spheres of human activity, particularly in science.Scientific institutions and universities should have a center for surveillance, security, promotion and development of quality research. Establishment of rules and respect the rules of good practice are the obligations of each research institutions, universities and every individual researchers, regardless of which area of science is being investigated. There are mi...

show abstract

“…Because of this uneven distribution it is impossible to estimate the IF on the basis of a single article or author (1, 5). …”

Section: Scientometricsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Plagiarism in Scientific Research and Publications and How to Prevent It

Masic¹

2014

Mater Sociomed

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Each scientific paper is recorded in data written by rules recommended by several scientific associations and committees. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Databases can contain information about the author (including bibliographic data and abstract) and the original work. Data set determines the type of base as: (a) bibliographic databases, (b) citation databases, (c) full-text databases.…”

Section: Generally About Biomedical Online Databasesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review of Most Important Biomedical Databases for Searching of Biomedical Scientific Literature

Masic¹,

Kurjak²,

Chervenak³

2012

Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…18,20,21 o Include journal hand searches. 15,17,18,[20][21][22] o Contact experts for unpublished literature. 15,16,18,20,21,24 o Include international literature.…”

Section: 16-182021mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…5,15,16,18,[20][21][22]24 • Describe method of data extraction from reports. 5,16,17,20 • List and define all variables for which data were sought.…”

Section: -2124mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The writer’s guide to education scholarship in emergency medicine: Systematic reviews and the scholarship of integration (part 4)

Murnaghan

Weersink

Thoma

et al. 2017

CJEM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Reviews help scholars consolidate evidence and guide their educational practice. However, few papers describe how to effectively publish review papers. We completed a scoping review to develop a set of quality indicators that will assist junior authors to publish reviews and integrative scholarship. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, ERIC, and Google Scholar were searched for English language articles published between 2012 and January 2016 using the terms review, medical education, how to publish, and emergency medicine. Titles and abstracts were reviewed by two authors and included if they focused on how to publish a review or outlined reporting guidelines of reviews. The articles were reviewed in parallel for calibration, and disagreements were resolved through a consensus. Results: A full text review of the 25 articles was conducted, and 196 recommendations were extracted from 13 articles. A hand search of the included articles' reference lists and expert recommendation found an additional eight articles. These recommendations were thematically analysed into a list of seven themes and 32 items. Additionally, seven evaluation tools and reporting guidelines were found to guide researchers in optimizing their reviews for publication.

show abstract

How to Search, Write, Prepare and Publish the Scientific Papers in the Biomedical Journals

Cited by 56 publications

References 7 publications

Plagiarism in Scientific Research and Publications and How to Prevent It

Plagiarism in Scientific Research and Publications and How to Prevent It

Review of Most Important Biomedical Databases for Searching of Biomedical Scientific Literature

The writer’s guide to education scholarship in emergency medicine: Systematic reviews and the scholarship of integration (part 4)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About