2016
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1606109113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to tune an enhancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of sequence composition, the main focus is on the organization of TFBSs: their nature (activating, repressing, granting accessibility), their number, their orientation and spacing, their relative affinity for particular TFs, as well as the interactions of their cognate TFs (cooperative binding, synergy, competition, short-and long-range repression) (Barolo, 2016;Erceg et al, 2014;Long et al, 2016;Weingarten-Gabbay and Segal, 2014;Yanez-Cuna et al, 2013). TFBS organization has been under intense scrutiny in the last two decades (Evans et al, 2012;Hare et al, 2008;Khoueiry et al, 2010;Levo and Segal, 2014;Ludwig et al, 2000;Ludwig et al, 2011;Spitz and Furlong, 2012;Swanson et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of sequence composition, the main focus is on the organization of TFBSs: their nature (activating, repressing, granting accessibility), their number, their orientation and spacing, their relative affinity for particular TFs, as well as the interactions of their cognate TFs (cooperative binding, synergy, competition, short-and long-range repression) (Barolo, 2016;Erceg et al, 2014;Long et al, 2016;Weingarten-Gabbay and Segal, 2014;Yanez-Cuna et al, 2013). TFBS organization has been under intense scrutiny in the last two decades (Evans et al, 2012;Hare et al, 2008;Khoueiry et al, 2010;Levo and Segal, 2014;Ludwig et al, 2000;Ludwig et al, 2011;Spitz and Furlong, 2012;Swanson et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[46]), by changing their original promoters for others with different initiation kinetics (strength and, in particular, relative duration of the rate-limiting steps in transcription initiation [13,18,23]). Similar tests could be performed by changing the binding affinities of TFs to the promoters, whose original values can be found in [15,9294], as these changes are expected to also allow changes in the transcription initiation kinetics of the genes composing the circuits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, new technologies offer new treatment options. There are now a variety of methods for blocking protein interactions with DNA or RNA (e.g., CRISPR-CAS9 technologies, anti-sense oligonucleotides, DNA decoys or small inhibitory molecules [ 113 , 116 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 , 146 , 147 , 148 , 149 ]). Perhaps fine-tuned and targeted manipulations of nuclear receptor binding sites within promoters, enhancers and switch sites of the immunoglobulin loci will ultimately prove successful for the control and optimization of immunoglobulin expression.…”
Section: When B Cells Need Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%