2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2011.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How will net neutrality be played out in Korea?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Net neutrality has been generally accepted worldwide, in that all packets transmitted over the public Internet be treated equally, regardless of source, ownership, content, or destination (Shin, 2014). In the Korean context, net neutrality has been discussed mostly within the frame of conflicting values between public interest and competition policy (Shin & Han, 2012). Traditionally, since much of the Korean economy has been driven by the Chaebol structure (business-government collusion), the net neutrality debate has sparked the issue of creating an industry structure that ensures public interest as well as enhances competition.…”
Section: Social Values In Network Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Net neutrality has been generally accepted worldwide, in that all packets transmitted over the public Internet be treated equally, regardless of source, ownership, content, or destination (Shin, 2014). In the Korean context, net neutrality has been discussed mostly within the frame of conflicting values between public interest and competition policy (Shin & Han, 2012). Traditionally, since much of the Korean economy has been driven by the Chaebol structure (business-government collusion), the net neutrality debate has sparked the issue of creating an industry structure that ensures public interest as well as enhances competition.…”
Section: Social Values In Network Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A model is created to test the model of net neutrality policy. Building upon the findings of previous research (Cheng et al, 2012;Kraemer, Wiewiorra, & Weinhardt, 2013;Shin & Han, 2012;Shin & Shim, 2015;Shrimali, 2008;Strover, 2010;Wallsten & Hausladen, 2009), a baseline model is identified, which is composed of three clustered components -antecedents, perceived values, and policy effectiveness. The regulatory debate and its underlying assumptions can be drawn from several focus group sessions and from the Delphi method (see Section 4 for details).…”
Section: Value Mapping and Structurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, Crocioni (2011) investigates the status of the regulatory debate in Europe and provides an economic regulation framework. Shin and Han (2012) review Korean information policy and propose a combination of legal regulations and transparency. Moreover, Carter et al (2010) compare the approaches used in the USA, Japan and the European Union.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%