2014
DOI: 10.1093/jeclap/lpu096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracies: the Vertical Expression of a Horizontal Desire?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The endogeneity of adoption decisions likely biases OLS estimates and attenuates estimated coefficients down. 46 To correct for this endogeneity problem, we turn to our IV/2SLS estimates. The 45 This is a conservative approach.…”
Section: Impact Of Adoption On Station Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The endogeneity of adoption decisions likely biases OLS estimates and attenuates estimated coefficients down. 46 To correct for this endogeneity problem, we turn to our IV/2SLS estimates. The 45 This is a conservative approach.…”
Section: Impact Of Adoption On Station Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Odudu (2011) discusses relevant early legal cases and gives some informal economic arguments about the logic of this type of agreements. In a companion paper, Sahuguet and Walckiers (2014) review some recent cases and analyze how hub-and-spoke collusion relates to traditional models of vertical and horizontal agreements. Van Cayseele (2014) also discusses the link between the legal and economic arguments surrounding hub-and-spoke collusion.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common supplier can also help retailers to coordinate price increases or serve as a category captain to organize marketing decisions. Competition authorities have analyzed these collusive practices quite extensively and have also prosecuted hub-and-spoke collusion in a number of jurisdictions, including the United States and the United Kingdom (see Odudu (2011) and Sahuguet and Walckiers (2014), for a recent review of the case law).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscript 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See alsoSahuguet and Walckiers (2014),Miegielsen (2014), andGarrod, Harrington, andOlczak (2020) for discussion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%