Hubungan Pusat-Daerah Gelombang Ketiga: sosok Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia Pasca Soeharto

Pratikno, Pratikno

doi:10.20885/unisia.vol22.iss39.art7

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, the New Order, which began in 1965, criticized Soekarno's Old Order administration for failing to establish regional political support. The New Order pledged an alternative approach for central-regional government relations (Pratikno, 2003), although it did not deliver. The central government controlled the regions fully, established a uniform government system in all regions, and centralized the political infrastructure (Pratikno, 2003).…”

Section: An Overview Of Political Reform and Broadcasting Decentraliz...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The New Order pledged an alternative approach for central-regional government relations (Pratikno, 2003), although it did not deliver. The central government controlled the regions fully, established a uniform government system in all regions, and centralized the political infrastructure (Pratikno, 2003). Consequently, the public insisted on changes and reformulation of the central-regional relations, leaving the New Order administration in a political legitimacy crisis.…”

Section: An Overview Of Political Reform and Broadcasting Decentraliz...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Challenge of Decentralization Policy for Television Broadcasting in Indonesia

RAHAYU

2023

JSP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to explain the challenges in the decentralization of television broadcasting in Indonesia, specifically, the role of political transformation over the last 20 years. Three provinces, i.e., Bali, South Sulawesi, and Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, were selected to represent various broadcasting operation characteristics in Indonesian provinces. Focusing on private television broadcasting, the case study examines the challenge of broadcasting decentralization policies in Indonesia. Data were collected via structured interviews involving 37 informants with a good understanding of local television broadcasting. The interviews were conducted in March, April, and July 2017. Meanwhile, secondary data in the form of relevant documents were analyzed using a desk study. Data were collected in two stages: May-September 2018 and November 2020-March 2021. These steps follow the current policy development on broadcasting decentralization. The findings indicate that decentralization faces challenges and that the policy has been tainted by media conglomerates’ economic interests and the central government’s recentralization politics. The economic interests were apparent in the fabrication of capital ownership and the centralization of business management and broadcast program production. The recentralization interests were noticeable through the operation license mechanism in the regions. In sum, Indonesia’s decentralization policy faces perpetual challenges from the surge of capitalization and the centralization of governance.

show abstract

Section: An Overview Of Political Reform and Broadcasting Decentraliz...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: An Overview Of Political Reform and Broadcasting Decentraliz...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Challenge of Decentralization Policy for Television Broadcasting in Indonesia

RAHAYU

2023

JSP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Hubungan Pusat-Daerah Gelombang Ketiga: sosok Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia Pasca Soeharto

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

The Challenge of Decentralization Policy for Television Broadcasting in Indonesia

The Challenge of Decentralization Policy for Television Broadcasting in Indonesia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About