Human-Centered Design Approaches in Digital Mental Health Interventions: Exploratory Mapping Review

Abstract

Background Digital mental health interventions have a great potential to alleviate mental illness and increase access to care. However, these technologies face significant challenges, especially in terms of user engagement and adoption. It has been suggested that this issue stems from a lack of user perspective in the development process; accordingly, several human-centered design approaches have been developed over the years to consider this important aspect. Yet, few human-centered design approaches to digital solutions exist in the field of mental health, and rarely are end users involved in their development. Objective The main objective of this literature review is to understand how human-centered design is considered in e-mental health intervention research. Methods An exploratory mapping review was conducted of mental health journals with the explicit scope of covering e-mental health technology. The human-centered design approaches reported and the core elements of design activity (ie, object, context, design process, and actors involved) were examined among the eligible studies. Results A total of 30 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 22 mentioned using human-centered design approaches or specific design methods in the development of an e-mental health solution. Reported approaches were classified as participatory design (11/27, 41%), codesign (6/27, 22%), user-centered design (5/27, 19%), or a specific design method (5/27, 19%). Just over half (15/27, 56%) of the approaches mentioned were supported by references. End users were involved in each study to some extent but not necessarily in designing. About 27% (8/30) of all the included studies explicitly mentioned the presence of designers on their team. Conclusions Our results show that some attempts have indeed been made to integrate human-centered design approaches into digital mental health technology development. However, these attempts rely very little on designers and design research. Researchers from other domains and technology developers would be wise to learn the underpinnings of human-centered design methods before selecting one over another. Inviting designers for assistance when implementing a particular approach would also be beneficial. To further motivate interest in and use of human-centered design principles in the world of e-mental health, we make nine suggestions for better reporting of human-centered design approaches in future research.

Applying Human-Centered Design in Global Mental Health to Improve Reach Among Underserved Populations in the United States and India

“…In line with guidance on best practices for HCD, both programs employed professional designers to develop the media used in each digital application and used participatory design approaches involving end users and iterative feedback loops. 41 For both case studies, we reveal how HCD can be used to address implementation barriers that contribute to inequities, particularly with regard to digital literacy and equitable access. These strategies included providing devices, adding features for offline use, and, key to the success of both case studies, training for digital use.…”

An e–Mental Health Resource for COVID-19–Associated Stress Reduction: Mixed Methods Study of Reach, Usability, and User Perceptions

“…However, research shows that these communities (older adults, indigenous peoples, and other racial and ethnic minority groups) are the least likely to seek web-based health information [ 25 , 52 , 54 ]. Proposed strategies to increase user engagement and technology acceptance of e-mental health among diverse populations include the implementation of a human-centered design approach that integrates designers and users in the development process from beginning to end [ 59 ].…”

A Mobile Phone Text Messaging Intervention to Manage Fatigue for People With Multiple Sclerosis, Spinal Cord Injury, and Stroke: Development and Usability Testing

“…This study followed a user-centric co-design approach, meaning that participants helped to shape the intervention and their study experience [ 36 ]. We used step-by-step procedures to develop and test the utility of the fatigue self-management SMS text messaging intervention.…”