2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.iswa.2022.200151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human-machine collaboration in intelligence analysis: An expert evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coefficients were tested for significance using the Pearson criterion. The procedure of expert analysis is not considered in this article in detail, which is due to its wide coverage in literature [3,19].…”
Section: Methodology For Assessing the Performance Of Ttm Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficients were tested for significance using the Pearson criterion. The procedure of expert analysis is not considered in this article in detail, which is due to its wide coverage in literature [3,19].…”
Section: Methodology For Assessing the Performance Of Ttm Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic tools assist intelligence analysts in data collection [5][6][7], data inspection and visualization [8], evidence credibility assessment [9,10], scenariobased question answering [11], hypotheses generation [12,13], and quality evaluation [14]. However, most current tools still require expensive crowdsourcing [15,16] or human-machine collaboration [17][18][19] in report generation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, a situation report requires foraging for different claims and hypotheses from the source documents (i.e., news articles) that help explain a situation [19], which is expensive to obtain through manual crowd-sourcing. However, recent work [47,48] has shown that directed queries, such as strategic questions in our case, can be used to automatically extract claims from news articles relevant to a particular topic.…”
Section: Question-driven Claim Extraction With Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AI and humans should be able to interact with each other effortlessly. A human-in-the-loop setup that takes advantage of both AI and human capabilities could indeed be the ideal solution (Toniolo et al, 2023). The integration of AI with human ingenuity is a promising area of future research.…”
Section: Human In the Loopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Humans prefer to oversee decision-making; hence it is unlikely that all AI systems will run without any human input. Current literature in the area of intelligent systems has started to focus on human empowerment, including a stronger focus on augmentation instead of pure automation, which would be beneficial for humanity (Holmes et al, 2021;Maciej Serda et al, 2022;Toniolo et al, 2023). Overall, the goal is to expand the discussion in the hope to trigger new conversations and ultimately convincing more researchers to think about how to incorporate ML models within business processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%