2020
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Papilloma Virus Increases ΔNp63α Expression in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Abstract: P63, and in particular the most expressed Np63α isoform, seems to have a critical role in the outcome of head and neck cancer. Many studies have been conducted to assess the possible use of p63 as a prognostic marker in squamous cell carcinoma cancers, but the results are still not well-defined. Moreover, a clear relationship between the expression of Np63α and the presence of high-risk HPV E6 and E7 oncoproteins has been delineated. Here we describe how Np63α is mostly expressed in HPV-positive compared to HP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We stratified the data according to the levels of NF-Y subunits (top 25% versus lowest 75%): NF-YA total and NF-YAl were not significant, but NF-YAs correlated with a better prognosis ( Figure 6 E, left panel). As positive controls, we evaluated CDKN2A, whose high levels are known to be protective [ 6 ], as well as ΔNp63, which we recently demonstrated to be increased in HPV-positive by the E6 viral protein [ 47 ]; both genes are indeed very significantly protective ( Figure 6 E, middle and right panels). Finally, pairwise combination of curves of NF-YAs with CDKN2A or ΔNp63 further confirmed this point ( Figure 6 F).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We stratified the data according to the levels of NF-Y subunits (top 25% versus lowest 75%): NF-YA total and NF-YAl were not significant, but NF-YAs correlated with a better prognosis ( Figure 6 E, left panel). As positive controls, we evaluated CDKN2A, whose high levels are known to be protective [ 6 ], as well as ΔNp63, which we recently demonstrated to be increased in HPV-positive by the E6 viral protein [ 47 ]; both genes are indeed very significantly protective ( Figure 6 E, middle and right panels). Finally, pairwise combination of curves of NF-YAs with CDKN2A or ΔNp63 further confirmed this point ( Figure 6 F).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P53 transcription factor family, including p53 (TP53), p63 (TP63) and p73 (TP73), is a key player in tumor development and formation. p63 is expressed by two different promoters, resulting in two isoforms (TAp63 and DNp63) with or without amino (N) terminal transactivation domain that is necessary to induce apoptosis and tumor inhibition [ 8 , 9 ]. Alternative splicing of the 3′ end of ΔNp63 mRNA produces α, β and γ subtype [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Fig. 2E, also in HPV-positive HNC cell lines ΔNp63α knock-down strongly reduces SMAD4 expression, suggesting that UMSCC47 has lower levels of SMAD4 compared to the other HPV-positive HNC cell lines due to the lack of ΔNp63α, whose expression is also regulated by HPV16 [19]. Since p53 silencing has been shown to increase SMAD4 expression in breast cancer cell lines [29], we hypothesise a possible role of p53, which is downregulated in the presence of E6, in the regulation of SMAD4.…”
Section: Hpv16 Regulates Smad4 Protein Levelmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…HNC cell lines, acquired from different sources [17], were accurately described and cited in our previous studies [18,19]. Cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Euroclone) supplemented with antibiotics, 2 mM L-glutamine, 10% FBS (Fisher Scientific) and non-essential amino-acids (NEAA).…”
Section: Cell Culturementioning
confidence: 99%