Human Pulp Responses to Partial Pulpotomy Treatment with TheraCal as Compared with Biodentine and ProRoot MTA: A Clinical Trial

Bakhtiar, Hengameh; Nekoofar, Mohammad Hossein; Aminishakib, Pouyan; Abedi, Fatemeh; Moosavi, Fereshteh Naghi; Esnaashari, Ehsan; Azizi, Arash; Esmailian, Samar; Ellini, Mohammad Reza; Mesgarzadeh, Vahid; Sezavar, Mehdi; About, Imad

doi:10.1016/j.joen.2017.06.025

Cited by 96 publications

(93 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Biodentine had a similar effect on dentin bridge formation to MTA (Table 3) [71,112,113]. In contrast to another study [46], a clinical trial in adults showed complete dentin bridge formation in 100% of Biodentine cases, compared to 11% and 56% in TheraCal®and ProRoot®MTA, respectively [114]. In terms of quality of induced dentin, MTA exceeded BD, although concerning completion of the dentin bridge, BD had better results.…”

Section: Biodentinementioning

confidence: 87%

Bio-Inductive Materials in Direct and Indirect Pulp Capping—A Review Article

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article is aimed at analyzing the available research and comparing the properties of bio-inductive materials in direct and indirect pulp capping procedures. The properties and clinical performances of four calcium-silicate cements (ProRoot MTA, MTA Angelus, RetroMTA, Biodentine), a light-cured calcium silicate-based material (TheraCal LC) and an enhanced resin-modified glass-ionomer (ACTIVA BioACTIVE) are widely discussed. A correlation of in vitro and in vivo data revealed that, currently, the most validated material for pulp capping procedures is still MTA. Despite Biodentine's superiority in relatively easier manipulation, competitive pricing and predictable clinical outcome, more long-term clinical studies on Biodentine as a pulp capping agent are needed. According to available research, there is also insufficient evidence to support the use of TheraCal LC or ACTIVA BioACTIVE BASE/LINER in vital pulp therapy.

show abstract

Section: Biodentinementioning

confidence: 87%

Bio-Inductive Materials in Direct and Indirect Pulp Capping—A Review Article

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This inflammation may be deleterious to the pulp regeneration process. Indeed, partial pulpotomy of human teeth with TheraCal revealed pulp tissue disorganization without formation of an organized dentin bridge, whereas a wellorganized and thick bridge was formed with Biodentine (32). The absence of mineralization may be due to the release of monomers that, in addition to their toxicity (33,34), have been shown to inhibit pulp cell differentiation and mineralization (35).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tricalcium Silicate Capping Materials Modulate Pulp Healing and Inflammatory Activity In Vitro

Giraud

Jeanneau

Bergmann

et al. 2018

Journal of Endodontics

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Periapical pathology was not recorded by radiographic examination as well as hypersensitivity by electro test. Inflammation was absent for all materials at 8 weeks check-up [96].…”

Section: Clinical Findings In Applications Of Calcium Silicate Cemmentioning

confidence: 86%

Physico-chemical and biological properties of dental calcium silicate cements - literature review

Ilic

Antonijević

Biočanin

et al. 2019

Hem Ind

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dental cement materials have been developed with the aim to replace hard dental tissues. The first material used for pulp capping, root canal obturation, bifurcation perforation and apexification is calcium hydroxide (in 1920). A half century later, glass-ionomer cements began to suppress it as dentine substitutes. Finally, in the 1990s, calcium silicate (CS) material appeared in the dental research community as the most promising dentine substitute capable to adequately meet all clinical requirements. The aim of this paper is to present an overview of literature related to studies about CS materials taking into account their physical, chemical and biological properties and clinical applications. This review aims to discuss beneficial and adverse characteristics of CSs concerning interactions to the hard dentine and soft pulp/periodontal tissues. This review article deals with the literature data about currently commercially available CS concerning laboratory and clinical findings. 109 scientific articles were analyzed of which 62 references reported in vitro and 26 in vivo investigations while 21 references comprised reports, reviews and books dealing with both, in vitro and in vivo investigations. Although further data collection is necessary, CSs are promising materials that represent a gold standard for numerous dental clinical procedures.

show abstract

Human Pulp Responses to Partial Pulpotomy Treatment with TheraCal as Compared with Biodentine and ProRoot MTA: A Clinical Trial

Cited by 96 publications

References 39 publications

Bio-Inductive Materials in Direct and Indirect Pulp Capping—A Review Article

Bio-Inductive Materials in Direct and Indirect Pulp Capping—A Review Article

Tricalcium Silicate Capping Materials Modulate Pulp Healing and Inflammatory Activity In Vitro

Physico-chemical and biological properties of dental calcium silicate cements - literature review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About