2015
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human rights as a topic and guide forLISresearch and practice

Abstract: In this global information age, accessing, disseminating, and controlling information is an increasingly important aspect of human life. Often, these interests are expressed in the language of human rights-for example, rights to expression, privacy, and intellectual property.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In one form or another, the concept of information inequity (i.e., the idea that some people have greater difficulty finding, accessing, accepting, or using information than others) has represented a core moral motivation for information behavior research since the turn toward user‐centered research and practice (Britz, ; Mathiesen, ; Samek, ). The more specific concept of information poverty has been used to refer to a persistent lack of information access as experienced by a group or an individual, usually as a result of social factors, embodied by various types of information‐related inequalities (e.g., chronic information illiteracy, lack of broadband access, or lack of information resources because of low income or education; Haider & Bawden, ; Yu, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one form or another, the concept of information inequity (i.e., the idea that some people have greater difficulty finding, accessing, accepting, or using information than others) has represented a core moral motivation for information behavior research since the turn toward user‐centered research and practice (Britz, ; Mathiesen, ; Samek, ). The more specific concept of information poverty has been used to refer to a persistent lack of information access as experienced by a group or an individual, usually as a result of social factors, embodied by various types of information‐related inequalities (e.g., chronic information illiteracy, lack of broadband access, or lack of information resources because of low income or education; Haider & Bawden, ; Yu, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also of note is the broader philosophical discussion regarding Library 2.0, technology, and privacy (see Ard 2016Ard , 2014Hoffmann 2016;Mathiesen 2015;Magi 2011). In light of the increasing use of advanced information and communication technologies in Library 2.0, Hoffmann (2016) applies the value of self-respect from moral and political philosophy to librarians and scholars interested in social justice issues as a foundation for libraries' protection of patron privacy and intellectual freedom.…”
Section: P R I Vac Y P O Li C I E S a N D P R Ac T I C E S _ F E At U R Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of the increasing use of advanced information and communication technologies in Library 2.0, Hoffmann (2016) applies the value of self-respect from moral and political philosophy to librarians and scholars interested in social justice issues as a foundation for libraries' protection of patron privacy and intellectual freedom. Continuing the social justice trend, Mathiesen (2015) finds that privacy and intellectual freedom are increasingly thought of as human rights in the global information age. Library and information science plays a central role in facilitating communication about human rights (Mathiesen 2015).…”
Section: P R I Vac Y P O Li C I E S a N D P R Ac T I C E S _ F E At U R Ementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within the domain of information ethics and policy, surveillance is often analyzed as a threat to individual rights such as privacy (e.g., Caidi & Ross, 2005;Doty, 2015;Gorham-Oscilowski & Jaeger, 2008;Jaeger et al, 2003;Jaeger et al, 2004;Jones, Asher, et al, 2020;Jones, Rubel, & LeClere, 2020;Mai, 2016a;Mai, 2016b;Mai, 2016c;Mathiesen, 2015;A. D. Moore, 2010;A.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%