2022
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00041.2022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human skeletal muscle size with ultrasound imaging: a comprehensive review

Abstract: Skeletal muscle size is an important factor in assessing adaptation to exercise training and detraining, athletic performance, age-associated atrophy and mobility decline, clinical conditions associated with cachexia, and overall skeletal muscle health. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) are widely accepted as the gold standard methods for skeletal muscle size quantification. However, it is not always feasible to use these methods (e.g., field studies, bedside studies, large cohort st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 175 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For the inter‐rater reliability, both the ICC and SEM were reported for the muscle length, cross‐sectional area, muscle volume, pennation angle, and fascicle length. The corresponding ICC values were generally similar to those of the healthy population 28,41,65 . The ICC is a relative measure of reliability, and mainly concerns the consistency of the measurement position or the relative rank of an individual in the group as compared to the other's.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the inter‐rater reliability, both the ICC and SEM were reported for the muscle length, cross‐sectional area, muscle volume, pennation angle, and fascicle length. The corresponding ICC values were generally similar to those of the healthy population 28,41,65 . The ICC is a relative measure of reliability, and mainly concerns the consistency of the measurement position or the relative rank of an individual in the group as compared to the other's.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The intrarater reliability of ultrasound was identified for all the abovementioned parameters in CP patients by calculating the ICC, which was generally comparable to those of MRI in assessing the lowerlimb muscles of CP patients 29,32 and ultrasound in assessing healthy peers. 20,28,41 The SEM of ultrasound was only identified for the muscle length, cross-sectional area, and muscle volume. For the inter-rater reliability, both the ICC and SEM were reported for the muscle length, cross-sectional area, muscle volume, pennation angle, and fascicle length.…”
Section: Reliability Of Muscle Architectural Measurements Using Ultra...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The echo intensity fairly reflects the intramuscular fat, as shown by comparison with magnetic resonance imaging 35 and computed tomography 36 . These measures were used to quantify muscle size and intermuscular fat, as previously reported 37,38 . The B‐mode images were exported from the ultrasound system to a personal computer as tagged image format files and processed using the ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health).…”
Section: Image Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, investigators have evaluated ultrasound imaging of muscle as a quantitative measure of muscle loss in humans, 22‐24 dogs, 13,25,26 and cats 27,28 . In dogs and cats, investigators measured epaxial muscle height (EMH) from transverse ultrasonographic images obtained at the level of the 13th thoracic vertebrae (T13) and validated this approach in healthy cats and cats with various degrees of muscle loss 13,25‐28 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%