2018
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Approach to Construction Project Risk Management with Simultaneous FMEA/ISO 31000/Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Optimization Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the previous studies that focus on the simple risk calculation methods [39][40][41], the proposed framework introduces the new method to identify and rank the high-level risks imposed on the transportation system of hazardous products for the first time. Also, the reason for using fuzzy FMEA in the proposed procedure is that the efficiency of this tool in risk calculation is proved by many studies before [42][43][44][45]. The following assumptions are considered to formulate the model:  Every vehicle begins its travel from the only available depot and finishes it at the same place.…”
Section: Model Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the previous studies that focus on the simple risk calculation methods [39][40][41], the proposed framework introduces the new method to identify and rank the high-level risks imposed on the transportation system of hazardous products for the first time. Also, the reason for using fuzzy FMEA in the proposed procedure is that the efficiency of this tool in risk calculation is proved by many studies before [42][43][44][45]. The following assumptions are considered to formulate the model:  Every vehicle begins its travel from the only available depot and finishes it at the same place.…”
Section: Model Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FMEA is a well‐known approach that has been implemented in many risk management projects having a variety of scopes. For more information on this approach, see Ahmadi, Behzadian, Ardeshir, and Kapelan (), Rahimi, Tavakkoli‐Moghaddam, Iranmanesh, and Vaez‐Alaei (), and Ershadi and Ershadi (). Although numerous discussions have been generated regarding issues such as project management and risk management, none has attempted to study environmental risk management as one of the most crucial issues involved in the results and performances of projects; instead, most are focused on the conceptual and organizational aspects of risk, and, in general, a comprehensive reflection is not yet made on the relationship between the environmental risk and the project (Cardona, ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework of the proposed FMEA method is consistent with ISO 31000 [ 56 ] on risk assessment, e.g., the process of calculating the RPN value in FMEA can be integrated into ISO 31000 as a quantification method of risk evaluation. Some researchers have built a hybrid method for risk identification, evaluation, and control based on FMEA and ISO 31000 [ 57 ].…”
Section: The Ambiguity Measure-based Fmea Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hybrid method based on DST and other methods, such as fuzzy sets theory, is also popular among researchers [ 54 , 55 ]. The international standard ISO 31000 [ 56 ] is also introduced to improve the FMEA method for risk identification, evaluation and control [ 57 ]. However, none of the aforementioned methods model the relative importance among different FMEA experts by considering the assessment data from the experts themselves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%