2017
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2017.2677839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Collision Avoidance-Tree Resolution for M2M Random Access

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple potential solutions have been proposed: dynamic adjustment of contention parameters (barring factor, backoff) [4], [8], load-adaptive and quality-of-service-aware RACH resource allocation [4], [9]. Also, methods for channel utilization improvement and fast collision resolution, such as tree algorithms or distributed queuing have been proposed in [3], [4]. However, all of the related works have considered only classical LTE deployment in a licensed band.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Multiple potential solutions have been proposed: dynamic adjustment of contention parameters (barring factor, backoff) [4], [8], load-adaptive and quality-of-service-aware RACH resource allocation [4], [9]. Also, methods for channel utilization improvement and fast collision resolution, such as tree algorithms or distributed queuing have been proposed in [3], [4]. However, all of the related works have considered only classical LTE deployment in a licensed band.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scenario is common for M2M communication, e.g., network recovery after a power outage, or alarm reporting in emergency situations [3], [7], [8]. All N M2M UEs are activated in a simultaneous manner over activation time T A according to a beta distribution [8]:…”
Section: Burst Connection Requests Arrivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Every UE j ∈ [1, N ] in the cell is activated within total activation time T A with Beta-distributed individual activation time t i a [4], [5]:…”
Section: Performance Comparison: Bcr Vs Acbmentioning
confidence: 99%