2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6911(02)00126-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid stabilization of planar linear systems with one-dimensional outputs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the preparation of this manuscript, it was pointed out that the result of Santarelli et al [12] is similar to the results of [18] and [19], with the exception that the framework of [12] employs continuous-time nonlinear feedback laws, while [18] and [19] employ hybrid feedback automata. The reader who is interested in exploring the differences between the switched feedback approach we take here and the hybrid feedback approach of [18] and [19] is encouraged to explore these two references.…”
Section: S(t) R (M +1) ∀T>0supporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the preparation of this manuscript, it was pointed out that the result of Santarelli et al [12] is similar to the results of [18] and [19], with the exception that the framework of [12] employs continuous-time nonlinear feedback laws, while [18] and [19] employ hybrid feedback automata. The reader who is interested in exploring the differences between the switched feedback approach we take here and the hybrid feedback approach of [18] and [19] is encouraged to explore these two references.…”
Section: S(t) R (M +1) ∀T>0supporting
confidence: 52%
“…The reader who is interested in exploring the differences between the switched feedback approach we take here and the hybrid feedback approach of [18] and [19] is encouraged to explore these two references.…”
Section: S(t) R (M +1) ∀T>0mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a plant P with binary control input u(t) ∈ U = {0, 1}, binary sensor output y(t) ∈ Y = {−1, 1} and upper bounded 4 performance output v(t) ∈ R. Consider a system M with inputs u(t) ∈ U and w(t) ∈ W = {0, 1}, and with outputs u(t) ∈ U,ỹ(t) ∈ Y andv(t) ∈ V, where V is a finite discrete subset of R. Suppose that M has the internal structure shown in Figure 3, whereM is a deterministic finite state machine. To ensure well-posedness, we require that there be no direct feedthrough from inputỹ to outputŷ inM : In other words,ŷ(t) is only allowed to be a function of the input u(t) and the state ofM at time t. Memoryless system φ is defined byỹ…”
Section: A a Notion Of Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the setting considered in this note where fixed, binary sensors are used leads to a more difficult state estimation (and thus controller synthesis) problem 3 . This case has been much less well studied, and has only begun to receive attention in the recent past [4], [20], [23]. Specifically, the use of finite state approximations in this context remains minimally explored.…”
Section: Introduction a Motivation And Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [2,3], the following result is obtained for B and C being nonzero matrices of rank 1: system (1.1) is stabilizable by a linear hybrid feedback control (LHFC) if and only if for at least one α ∈ R, the matrix A + αBC does not have nonnegative real eigenvalues. This result gives a necessary and sufficient stabilization condition, and it is straightforward that making use of hybrid feedback controls provides a better stabilization criterion compared to any one we can obtain exploiting ordinary feedback controls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%