2010
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/189/1/204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic Models of Type I X-Ray Bursts: Metallicity Effects

Abstract: Type I X-ray bursts are thermonuclear stellar explosions driven by chargedparticle reactions. In the regime for combined H/He-ignition, the main nuclear flow is dominated by the rp-process (rapid proton-captures and β + -decays), the 3α-reaction, and the αp-process (a suite of (α,p) and (p,γ) reactions). The main flow is expected to proceed away from the valley of stability, eventually reaching the proton drip-line beyond A = 38. Detailed analysis of the relevant reactions along the main path has only been sca… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
128
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
7
128
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The network used for additional reaction rates is the relevant subset of that used in Ref. [52]. The estimated 22 Na yields (mass-averaged mass fractions in the overall ejected shells) are listed in Table VI, which clearly shows that the impact of the central value of new rate roughly translates into lower 22 Na abundances by a factor up to ∼ 2 with respect to previous estimates.…”
Section: Astrophysical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The network used for additional reaction rates is the relevant subset of that used in Ref. [52]. The estimated 22 Na yields (mass-averaged mass fractions in the overall ejected shells) are listed in Table VI, which clearly shows that the impact of the central value of new rate roughly translates into lower 22 Na abundances by a factor up to ∼ 2 with respect to previous estimates.…”
Section: Astrophysical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Schatz et al (2014), absent even-A nuclides, excluded by Meisel et al (2015); Deibel et al (2016b). Type I X-ray burst ashes from the multi-zone calculations from Cyburt et al (2016), as well as the last burst from models 1 and 2 of José et al (2010) are included for comparison. on models described in Keek et al (2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent reviews of XRB models [5,6,17,18,19], including post-processing model [18], onezone model [15,17], and multizone 1D hydrodynamic model [20], the reactions of 64 Ge(p,γ) 65 As and 65 As(p,γ) 66 Se are identified to have a critical impact on nucleosynthesis during XRBs. The last two models are fully self-consistent that consider the mutual influence of changes between nuclear energy generation and astrophysical condition [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%