2022
DOI: 10.2166/hydro.2022.042
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrological modeling for streamflow and sediment yield simulation using the SWAT model in a forest-dominated watershed of north-eastern Himalayas of Kashmir Valley, India

Abstract: In this study, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was used to examine the spatial variability of sediment yield, quantify runoff, and soil loss at the sub-basin level and prioritize sub-basins in the Sindh watershed due to its computational efficiency in complex watersheds. The Sequential Uncertainty Fitting-2 approach was used to determine the sensitivity and uncertainty of model parameters. The parameter sensitivity analysis showed that Soil Conservation Services Curve Number II is the most sens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 10 parameters above are sensitive because of the unique climatic and topographical conditions in the HRB from a physical point of view. This also indicates that, in analyzing the sensitivity of model parameters, sensitivity index should be considered from a mathematical aspect, and comprehensive analysis should be performed from the underlying surface of the basin, climatic conditions, and other aspects [63][64][65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 10 parameters above are sensitive because of the unique climatic and topographical conditions in the HRB from a physical point of view. This also indicates that, in analyzing the sensitivity of model parameters, sensitivity index should be considered from a mathematical aspect, and comprehensive analysis should be performed from the underlying surface of the basin, climatic conditions, and other aspects [63][64][65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%