<i>Four Conversations</i>: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online, Personalized Coping and Decision Aid for Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

Smith, Sophia K.; Westbrook, Kelly; MacDermott, Kristin; Amarasekara, Sarthya; LeBlanc, Matthew Roger; Pan, Wei

doi:10.1089/jpm.2019.0234

Cited by 8 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Interactive, multimedia/multimodal online programs included videos, interactive values questions, and/or written materials, such as ADs, booklets, pamphlets, or workbooks 101‐105 . Three programs were designed for low‐literacy populations 102,106,107 and two for non–English‐speaking participants 23,108 .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…64,[98][99][100] Interactive, multimedia/multimodal online programs included videos, interactive values questions, and/or written materials, such as ADs, booklets, pamphlets, or workbooks. [101][102][103][104][105] Three programs were designed for lowliteracy populations 102,106,107 and two for non-Englishspeaking participants. 23,108 One study included patient and surrogate interventions, 103 and one included patient and clinician interventions.…”

Section: Intervention Modalitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Deconstructing the Complexities of Advance Care Planning Outcomes: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? A Scoping Review

McMahan

Tellez

Sudore

2020

J American Geriatrics Society

308

287

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Intervention Modalitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Deconstructing the Complexities of Advance Care Planning Outcomes: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? A Scoping Review

McMahan

Tellez

Sudore

2020

J American Geriatrics Society

308

287

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Full texts were retrieved from 72 studies, and Google Scholar and citation searches identified 8 additional studies. A total of 16 studies satisfied the eligibility criteria and were included in this review [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most DAs were specific to the post-primary treatment survivorship phase, except ACP and insurance plan decisions after diagnosis [42,48,49,[51][52][53]. The users of the two DAs of ACP were broad, including the cancer population as a subgroup [42,48].…”

Section: Range Of Das On Survivorship Services-related Decisionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Decision aids for cancer survivors’ engagement with survivorship care services after primary treatment: a systematic review

Zhou

Chan

et al. 2022

J Cancer Surviv

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To elucidate existing decision aids (DAs) in supporting cancer survivors’ decisions to engage in cancer survivorship care services after primary treatment. Secondary objectives are to assess the DA acceptability, impact of DAs, and implementation barriers. Methods Databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL) were searched to collect publications from inception through September 2021. Studies describing the development or evaluation of DAs used for survivorship care services after primary cancer treatment were included. Article selection and critical appraisal were conducted independently by two authors. Results We included 16 studies that described 13 DAs and addressed multiple survivorship care domains: prevention of recurrence/new cancers in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors and breast cancer gene mutation carriers, family building options, health insurance plans, health promotion (substance use behavior, cardiovascular disease risk reduction), advanced care planning, and post-treatment follow-up intensity. The electronic format was used to design most DAs for self-administration. The content presentation covered decisional context, options, and value clarification exercises. DAs were acceptable and associated with higher knowledge but presented inconclusive decisional outcomes. Implementation barriers included lack of design features for connectivity to care, low self-efficacy, and low perceived DA usefulness among healthcare professionals. Other survivor characteristics included age, literacy, preferred timing, and setting. Conclusions A diverse range of DAs exists in survivorship care services engagement with favorable knowledge outcomes. Future work should clarify the impact of DAs on decisional outcomes. Implications for Cancer Survivors DA characterization and suggestions for prospective developers could enhance support for cancer survivors encountering complex decisions throughout the survivorship continuum.

show abstract

Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions

Stacey,

Lewis,

Smith

et al. 2024

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Four Conversations: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online, Personalized Coping and Decision Aid for Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

Cited by 8 publications

References 11 publications

Deconstructing the Complexities of Advance Care Planning Outcomes: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? A Scoping Review

Deconstructing the Complexities of Advance Care Planning Outcomes: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? A Scoping Review

Decision aids for cancer survivors’ engagement with survivorship care services after primary treatment: a systematic review

Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About