2014
DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20148000001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

I= 1/2 Rule andK: 2014

Abstract: I summarize the status of the ∆I = 1/2 rule in K → ππ decays within an analytic approach based on the dual representation of QCD as a theory of weakly interacting mesons for large N, where N is the number of colours. This approximate approach, developed in the 1980s by William Bardeen, Jean-Marc Gérard and myself, allowed us already 28 years ago to identify the dominant dynamics behind the ∆I = 1/2 rule. However, the recent inclusion of lowest-lying vector meson contributions in addition to the pseudoscalar on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the lattice QCD approach has a better control over the errors than our approach, it does not provide the physical picture of the dynamics behind the obtained numerical results. This is in particular seen in the case of the ∆I = 1/2 rule where our analytic approach offers a very simple picture of the dynamics behind this rule, as summarized again in [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the lattice QCD approach has a better control over the errors than our approach, it does not provide the physical picture of the dynamics behind the obtained numerical results. This is in particular seen in the case of the ∆I = 1/2 rule where our analytic approach offers a very simple picture of the dynamics behind this rule, as summarized again in [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…But already in the second half of the 1980s, we have developed an approach to K 0 −K 0 mixing and non-leptonic K-meson decays [7][8][9][10][11] based on the dual representation of QCD as a theory of weakly interacting mesons for large N , where N is the number of colours [12][13][14][15]. The most recent results from our approach can be found in [16,17]. This approach provided, in particular, first results within QCD for the amplitudes ReA 0 and ReA 2 in the ballpark of experimental values [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this limit there are no QCD corrections to the Wilson coefficient of the current-current operator Q 2 = (su) V −A (ūd) V −A representing a simple tree-level W ± exchange and the relevant hadronic matrix elements of this operator can be calculated exactly in terms of pion decay constant F π and the masses m K and m π by just factorizing the operator matrix element into the product of matrix elements of quark currents. One finds then [2] ReA 0 = 3.59 × 10 −8 GeV, ReA 2 = 2.54 × 10 −8 GeV , R = √ 2 (3) in plain disagreement with the data in (1) and (2). It should be emphasized that the explanation of the missing enhancement factor of 15.8 in R through some dynamics must simultaneously give the correct values for ReA 0 and ReA 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Therefore I changed my strategy and concentrated since 2014 [2], with few exceptions, on Kaon flavour physics. A series of reviews on our work appeared in [3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…but also this result indicates that SM has some problems in reproducing the data. As the bound in (4.6) plays a significant role in the conclusion that NP could be at work in ε /ε, let me ask sceptical readers to have a look at [69,70] where other successes of the large N approach [66,67,[71][72][73][74] are summarized. In particular those related to the ∆I = 1/2 rule and thê B K parameter entering ε K that after almost three decades are supported by lattice QCD.…”
Section: 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%