2004
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.92.105505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situESR Observation of Interface Dangling Bond Formation Processes During UltrathinSiO2Growth On Si(111)

Abstract: We report the formation processes of interface dangling bonds (Pb centers) during initial oxidation of a clean Si(111) surface using an ultrahigh-vacuum electron-spin-resonance technique. At the oxidation of one or two Si layer(s), the Pb center density reached around 2.5-3.0 x 10(12) cm(-2), which is the same density as in the case of thick SiO2. This result shows that the Pb center density does not originate from the long-range accumulation of the structural stress between two materials, but from the chemica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If these dangling bonds remain even after thermal treatments, they should act as the E 0 centers and charge traps in the oxide 22) or as the P b centers and charge traps at the interface. [23][24][25][26] Even if those dangling bonds are terminated by H atoms during the thermal treatments, they could be latent charge traps and be activated by some electrical excitation. Since these remaining dangling bonds or H-terminated dangling bonds are often discussed as the source of the charge traps and the trigger of the dielectric breakdown of the gate oxide, [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] further investigation on the excess Si around the interface will lead us toward the fine control of the dielectric reliability of the gate oxide.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If these dangling bonds remain even after thermal treatments, they should act as the E 0 centers and charge traps in the oxide 22) or as the P b centers and charge traps at the interface. [23][24][25][26] Even if those dangling bonds are terminated by H atoms during the thermal treatments, they could be latent charge traps and be activated by some electrical excitation. Since these remaining dangling bonds or H-terminated dangling bonds are often discussed as the source of the charge traps and the trigger of the dielectric breakdown of the gate oxide, [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] further investigation on the excess Si around the interface will lead us toward the fine control of the dielectric reliability of the gate oxide.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the natural abundance of 29 Si ͑I =1/2͒ is low ͑4%͒ and most of the Pb centers on SiO 2 surface do not present hyperfine coupling. [52][53][54] The frequency at which the signal can be detected might also be affected by local electric field oscillations. However, this is true for Pb centers on SiO 2 rather than in organic radicals as reported in literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the (110) Si/SiO 2 interface again, only one type, the P b variant, is observed [31]. Thus, all three variants were shown to be interfacial trivalent Si centers [32], naturally occurring, for standard oxidation temperatures (800-960 C), in areal densities of [P b ] $ 5 Â 10 12 cm À2 [33][34][35][36] and [P b0 ], [P b1 ] $ 1 Â 10 12 cm À2 [36].…”
Section: Defects and Their Signatures In Esrmentioning
confidence: 99%