2020
DOI: 10.1017/s0021859621000034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ techniques to predict in vivo digestibility and to evaluate the impact of flint maize processing methods on degradation parameters

Abstract: This study aimed to (1) evaluate the effects of flint maize processing methods on the estimation of the readily soluble fraction (a), the potentially degradable fraction (b) and the rate of degradation of b (c) for dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM) and starch in the rumen; and (2) verify whether two different applications of in situ technique can be used to estimate in vivo DM, OM and starch digestibilities. Five ruminally cannulated Nellore bulls (265 ± 18.2 kg; 8 ± 1.0 mo) were distributed in a 5 × 5 Lati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, N‐NH 3 was least for steers fed high moisture, semi‐dent corn, and it decreased 1 h (i.e., peak) after the feed delivery. According to Godoi et al (2020), the ensilage process may increase the availability of nutrients. Thus, will occur synchronization between starch and protein degradation and the N‐NH 3 can decrease because to bettering utilization in the rumen environment by microbial synthesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, N‐NH 3 was least for steers fed high moisture, semi‐dent corn, and it decreased 1 h (i.e., peak) after the feed delivery. According to Godoi et al (2020), the ensilage process may increase the availability of nutrients. Thus, will occur synchronization between starch and protein degradation and the N‐NH 3 can decrease because to bettering utilization in the rumen environment by microbial synthesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies (Akins and Shaver, 2014; Ferraretto et al ., 2018; Bernardes and Castro, 2019; Godoi et al ., 2021 a , 2021 b ) have reported an improvement in starch digestibility when maize is harvested, stored and fed as snaplage. However, many factors may interfere with the digestibility of starch in diets based on grain silages, such as the moisture content at harvest time and ensiling (Owens et al ., 1997; Lardy and Anderson, 2016), particle size (Rémond et al ., 2004; Lardy and Anderson, 2016) as well as the length of storage time (Hoffman et al ., 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of a forage harvester fitted with a maize snapper header and an on-board grain processor allows simultaneous harvesting and chopping of snaplage components (Lardy and Anderson, 2016; Ferraretto et al ., 2018). Also, snaplage is considered a high-energy feed product (Lardy and Anderson, 2016) that could be used as an exclusive fibre and energy source in feedlot diets or in combination with other feeds (Godoi et al ., 2021 b ). Therefore, diet formulation using snaplage will vary according to the harvest methods and desired performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%