2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10310-016-0524-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pinus halepensissomatic embryogenesis is affected by the physical and chemical conditions at the initial stages of the process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Neither the temperature nor the interaction between the temperature and the agar concentration were statistically significant. These results are in agreement with previous studies on initiation stage (Pereira et al, 2016) where only significant differences were found for agar concentration.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Neither the temperature nor the interaction between the temperature and the agar concentration were statistically significant. These results are in agreement with previous studies on initiation stage (Pereira et al, 2016) where only significant differences were found for agar concentration.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results are in agreement with results obtained by Kvaalen & Johnsen (2008) in Picea abies, and opposite to findings reported by García-Mendiguren et al (2016) in P. radiata where they did not find differences among proliferation treatments for somatic embryo production. Furthermore, different environmental conditions at initiation stage of P. halepensis SE, did not lead to significant differences in the number of somatic embryos obtained (Pereira et al, 2016). So, for this species, it appears that different environmental conditions have a greater influence when applied during proliferation than during initiation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is clear that the water availability registered in our experiments is not sub-optimal for the maturation of EMs. In our laboratory, the effect of different physical and chemical conditions at the initiation stage of P. radiata and P. halepensis (García-Mendiguren et al, 2016; Pereira et al, 2016) as well as in proliferation stage of P. halepensis (Pereira et al, 2017) was studied and we found that the highest temperature seemed to produce a selective pressure as pointed by Fehér (2015); In this regard, Bonga et al (2010) suggested that reducing or increasing temperatures may improve initiation and proliferation since temperature stress may promote cellular reprogramming. Our results are in agreement with de Almeida et al (2014) where temperature had a significant influence on the direct SE capacity in coffee.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%