2015
DOI: 10.1177/1938640015595044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ICD-10 and Its Impact on Our Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Throughout its history, the NIS has used various iterations of the ICD, and in the fourth quarter of 2015, it switched from the use of International Classification of Diseases, 9 th Revision, (ICD-9) to the newer International Classification of Diseases, 10 th Revision, (ICD-10) standard [ 20 ]. While the introduction ICD-10 has allowed providers to document patient progress with added granularity, the increased complexity of ICD-10 has concurrently presented challenges to consistently tracking patient outcomes during the transition from ICD-9 [ [25] , [26] , [27] ]. Since this change, there has been a paucity of data describing updated trends in revision arthroplasty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout its history, the NIS has used various iterations of the ICD, and in the fourth quarter of 2015, it switched from the use of International Classification of Diseases, 9 th Revision, (ICD-9) to the newer International Classification of Diseases, 10 th Revision, (ICD-10) standard [ 20 ]. While the introduction ICD-10 has allowed providers to document patient progress with added granularity, the increased complexity of ICD-10 has concurrently presented challenges to consistently tracking patient outcomes during the transition from ICD-9 [ [25] , [26] , [27] ]. Since this change, there has been a paucity of data describing updated trends in revision arthroplasty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On October 1, 2015, the coding standard for the ICD was updated, and the ICD, tenth edition, (ICD-10) was introduced. Since the transition from ICD, ninth editon, to ICD-10, there has been a lack of data describing updated trends in indications for rTKA [ [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%