2018
DOI: 10.5593/sgem2018/1.1/s01.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ice Scours on the Exposed Bottom of the Aral Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the Caspian Sea this value was from 300 to 1300 AFDD [58], being greater than in the region of Lake Erie (285 to 582 AFDD, [23]). At the same time, the depth of ice impact at Lake Erie reaches 25 m [7,23], while the maximum depth of stamukha penetration in the Caspian Sea is 12 m [11] with average values of 2-5 m [29]. The values for the Aral Sea at Barsakelmes Island in its middle part reach 316-1415 AFDD [59], being close to the Caspian Sea values.…”
Section: Ice-gouging Intensity Patternsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At the Caspian Sea this value was from 300 to 1300 AFDD [58], being greater than in the region of Lake Erie (285 to 582 AFDD, [23]). At the same time, the depth of ice impact at Lake Erie reaches 25 m [7,23], while the maximum depth of stamukha penetration in the Caspian Sea is 12 m [11] with average values of 2-5 m [29]. The values for the Aral Sea at Barsakelmes Island in its middle part reach 316-1415 AFDD [59], being close to the Caspian Sea values.…”
Section: Ice-gouging Intensity Patternsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The depths of ice gouging in the American Great Lakes (17-21 m, Table 3) are comparable to the Arctic Seas [23]. In the Caspian Sea, the zone of the most intense ice gouging was proved to appear in shallower water areas at depths of 2-5 m [29].…”
Section: Ice-gouging Intensity Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation