Identification and Visualization of the Intellectual Structure in Graphene Research

Abstract

Since the discovery of the promising properties of graphene, research in the field has attracted numerous grants and sponsors, leading to an exponential rise in the number of papers and applications. This article presents a global map of graphene research and its intellectual structure, drawn using the terms of more than 50,000 documents extracted from Scopus database, years 1998-2015. The unit of analysis consisted of descriptors (including Author Keywords and Indexed Keywords), with the co-occurrence of descriptor as the unit of measure, using fractional counting. The main research lines identified are: Fundamental Research, Functionalization and Biomedical Applications, Technology and Devices, Materials Science, Energy Storage, Optics and Chemical Properties and Sensors. Using overlay maps, we depict the graphene research efforts of the United States, the European Union (Europe-28), and China, and project their evolution through longitudinal maps to facilitate comparison. The United States was initially at the head of world output in graphene research, but was surpassed by China in 2011 and by Europe in 2014, as a result of their respective scientific policies and financial support. The output of China has since been so intense that it can be said to mark graphene research trends. We believe this information may be valuable for the core community involved in this scientific field, as it offers a large-scale analysis showing how research has changed over time. It is therefore also helpful for policy makers and research planners. The resulting maps are a useful and attractive tool for the graphene research community, as they reveal the main lines of exploration at a glance. The methodology described here could be re-created in any other field of science to uncover and display its intellectual structure and evolution over time.

Coronavirus mapping in scientific publications: When science advances rapidly and collectively, is access to this knowledge open to society?

“…These features are relevant in order to conduct our research. Similar criteria could be observed in the study of Vargas-Quesada et al (2017) and Belli and Baltà (2019), who also prefer VOSviewer (version 1.6.15) over other software tools.…”

Production Trends, Collaboration, and Main Topics of the Integrative and Complementary Oncology Research Area: A Bibliometric Analysis

“…All the articles referring to ICO in the period 1976-2017 were assessed according to the following criteria: journals, institutions, and countries. In addition, leading to further comprehension of global trends, these analyses were performed by dividing the whole period into 3 different subperiods 27 : ( a ) preliminary development, ( b ) fast development, and ( c ) Consolidated development. This division is based on the visual representation of the field production over time.…”

Trends in Sigma-1 Receptor Research: A 25-Year Bibliometric Analysis

“…It is widely used in various areas to estimate the productivity of institutions, countries, and authors; and identify international collaborations and geographic distributions (Chinchilla-Rodríguez et al, 2015). More recently it is being used to explore research hotspots and frontiers in specific fields such as diseases (Zhou et al, 2018), materials (Vargas-Quesada et al, 2017), genes/proteins/targets (Zongyi et al, 2016; Lu et al, 2018; Zhao et al, 2018), and drugs (Sweileh et al, 2016; Hernandez-Vasquez et al, 2018; Zyoud et al, 2018). To our knowledge, no previous bibliometric analysis on Sigma-1 receptor has been published.…”