2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.matbio.2012.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a functional proprotein convertase cleavage site in microfibril-associated glycoprotein 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two MAGPs share a functional C-terminal matrix-binding domain that is characterized by conserved cysteine residues (9,10). MAGP2 has a conserved proprotein convertase cleavage site within this domain that makes MAGP2 a substrate for multiple proprotein convertase family members (11). Also unique to MAGP2 is an RGD integrin-binding motif located at the N terminus.…”
Section: The Ecmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two MAGPs share a functional C-terminal matrix-binding domain that is characterized by conserved cysteine residues (9,10). MAGP2 has a conserved proprotein convertase cleavage site within this domain that makes MAGP2 a substrate for multiple proprotein convertase family members (11). Also unique to MAGP2 is an RGD integrin-binding motif located at the N terminus.…”
Section: The Ecmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunoblotting analysis of both T3 cell lysates and conditioned medium indicates that MAGP2 is processed as previously described (Donovan et al, 2013). Specifically, the wild-type MAGP2 protein and the cleavageresistant mutant form of MAGP2 (RR → AA) in the whole cell lysate are of similar apparent molecular mass of~23 kD (Fig.…”
Section: Microfibril Association Of Magp2 Is Promoted By Pc Processinmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The RR → AA and ΔC20 mutations have been previously described (Donovan et al, 2013), as have the MAGP2 CT and MAGP2 NT constructs (Miyamoto et al, 2006). The RR → AA mutant is the same as construct 'M' in Donovan et al, and the MAGP2 CT and NT constructs are the same as C-mycMAGP-2 and N-MAGP-2 in Miyamoto et al, 2006, respec-tively.…”
Section: Plasmids and Cell Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations