2013
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02420-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Anaerobic Bacteria by Bruker Biotyper Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry with On-Plate Formic Acid Preparation

Abstract: Identification of anaerobic bacteria using phenotypic methods is often time-consuming; methods such as 16S rRNA gene sequencing are costly and may not be readily available. We evaluated 253 clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria using the Bruker MALDI Biotyper (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA) matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) system with a user-supplemented database and an on-plate formic acid-based preparation method and compared results to those of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
2
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
47
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to a recent report by Nagy et al (2012), who could identify 218/ 283 (77 %) isolates to species level (with score ¢2.0) and 31/ 283 of isolates (10.95 %) to genus level (with score 1.7-2.0) and 34 isolates (12 %) gave no reliable identification (score ,1.7). Another group (Schmitt et al, 2012) found that correct genus identification could be achieved for 57 % (120/ 209) of anaerobes with score .2.0, and correct species identification was achieved for 80 % (168/209) of the isolates. The identification of anaerobes by MS offers several advantages in comparison with the conventional routine method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to a recent report by Nagy et al (2012), who could identify 218/ 283 (77 %) isolates to species level (with score ¢2.0) and 31/ 283 of isolates (10.95 %) to genus level (with score 1.7-2.0) and 34 isolates (12 %) gave no reliable identification (score ,1.7). Another group (Schmitt et al, 2012) found that correct genus identification could be achieved for 57 % (120/ 209) of anaerobes with score .2.0, and correct species identification was achieved for 80 % (168/209) of the isolates. The identification of anaerobes by MS offers several advantages in comparison with the conventional routine method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent publications demonstrate the ability of MALDI-TOF MS to correctly and rapidly identify Actinomyces spp. (15,16,17,18). MALDI-TOF MS may be considered an alternative method for routine identification, provided the database is up to date.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…По результатам MALDI-TOF масс-спектро-метрии, при которой полученные характеристики сравнивались с данными более чем 4000 видов бактерий [32], штамм был идентифицирован как Streptococcus oralis. При этом использованные анализаторы указы-вали на низкую достоверность дискриминации, не по-зволяющую точно идентифицировать микроб среди имеющихся в базе.…”
Section: ф у н д а м е н т а л ь н ы е и с с л е д о в а н и я в п р unclassified