2006
DOI: 10.1049/ip-cta:20045250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of continuous-time systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
118
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
118
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Identifying continuous time [Rao and Unbehauen, 2006] models requires the computation of signal derivatives while identifying discrete time models does not.…”
Section: Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying continuous time [Rao and Unbehauen, 2006] models requires the computation of signal derivatives while identifying discrete time models does not.…”
Section: Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea in [21,26] is to set up an iteration between a linear least squares optimization and a forward solution, which is partly based on a Picard iteration [34]. This approach is therefore distinctively different from other integral formulations like the modulating function approach [35] which does not iterate and is therefore not directly suitable for the discrete data and high non-linearities present in this application. Furthermore, the CVS model of Fig.…”
Section: Unique Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the pole-placed method with spectral factorization satisfies basic control requirements such as disturbance attenuation, stability and reference signal tracking. Although the polynomial synthesis is considered for the continuous-time ELM, the recursive identification with exponential forgetting (Rao and Unbehauen 2005) runs in discrete time which is better from computation and programming point of view. This disagreement could be overcome with the use so called Delta (δ-) models (Middleton and Goodwin 2004) that belong the discrete-time models but parameters approaches to the continuous ones for the small sampling period (Stericker and Sinha 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%