2011
DOI: 10.1038/ng.946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of genetic elements that autonomously determine DNA methylation states

Abstract: Cytosine methylation is a repressive, epigenetically propagated DNA modification. Although patterns of DNA methylation seem tightly regulated in mammals, it is unclear how these are specified and to what extent this process entails genetic or epigenetic regulation. To dissect the role of the underlying DNA sequence, we sequentially inserted over 50 different DNA elements into the same genomic locus in mouse stem cells. Promoter sequences of approximately 1,000 bp autonomously recapitulated correct DNA methylat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

34
344
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 366 publications
(380 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
34
344
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding has important implications for transcriptional regulation: First, it argues that context-dependent TF binding is determined by the cis-regulatory sequence, consistent with the sufficiency of enhancer sequences to recapitulate their endogenous chromatin state (i.e., histone modifications and DNA methylation) (e.g., Lienert et al 2011) and activity (e.g., Banerji et al 1983;Doyle et al 1989;Visel et al 2009) in different contexts. Second, in vivo binding appears to be determined by combinations of TF motifs rather than a single TF's motif, therefore substantially increasing the information content and specificity of in vivo binding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…This finding has important implications for transcriptional regulation: First, it argues that context-dependent TF binding is determined by the cis-regulatory sequence, consistent with the sufficiency of enhancer sequences to recapitulate their endogenous chromatin state (i.e., histone modifications and DNA methylation) (e.g., Lienert et al 2011) and activity (e.g., Banerji et al 1983;Doyle et al 1989;Visel et al 2009) in different contexts. Second, in vivo binding appears to be determined by combinations of TF motifs rather than a single TF's motif, therefore substantially increasing the information content and specificity of in vivo binding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…All nine elements were inserted separately into a previously described target site in the β-globin locus using CRE-mediated recombination (28) (Fig. 1A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously suggested that TF binding within CGIs contributes to their low DNA methylation (28), which could be relevant for the recruitment of the H3K27me3 mark because occupancy of DNA methylation and H3K27me3 in ES cells has been observed to be mutually exclusive at CGIs (33), leading to the hypothesis that DNA methylation could inhibit H3K27me3 acquisition. To explore whether increased DNA methylation could account for the absence of H3K27me3 at the two elements with modified sequence backbone, we first determined their DNA methylation state.…”
Section: Dna Methylation and H3k27me3 Recruitment Exclude Each Other Atmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, DNA methylation is conserved across extremely long evolutionary times (20). Moreover, DNA methylation patterns of specific genomic regions may be determined by sequence characteristics themselves (21).…”
Section: Majority Of Duplicate Genes Exhibit Consistent Patterns Of Dnamentioning
confidence: 99%