2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of particulate matter determinants in residential homes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
46
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
7
46
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to previous studies, we did not find any association with traffic density (collector road within 50 m) or time spent in a vehicle with the personal or indoor PM 2.5 and PM 2.5abs levels. This is likely due to a relatively small amount of traffic in Jynkkä, where the mean concentrations of traffic emissions and road dust have been approximated to be 0.7 and 0.6 µg/m 3 , respectively …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to previous studies, we did not find any association with traffic density (collector road within 50 m) or time spent in a vehicle with the personal or indoor PM 2.5 and PM 2.5abs levels. This is likely due to a relatively small amount of traffic in Jynkkä, where the mean concentrations of traffic emissions and road dust have been approximated to be 0.7 and 0.6 µg/m 3 , respectively …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…We did not find any association between wood burning and daily levels of indoor PM 2.5 . A clear association between the use of a fireplace and indoor particle concentrations in winter time has been found in a study conducted in Italy in southern Europe . One important difference between this study and our study is the type of room heaters used by people in different countries.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Results from the present study are basically consistent with the finding demonstrating that PM2.5-10 was greatly influenced by the occupants and cleaning activities [30].…”
Section: S127supporting
confidence: 82%
“…In fact, on the one hand, double monitoring allows seasonal effect on IAPs concentrations to be ascertained in view of not only inter‐building but also intra‐building variability in the two seasons. On the other hand, repeated measurements of the same parameter are expected to be associated, thus, in addition to the independent variables as fixed effects (ie, potential determinants), the unmeasured latent factors that each monitoring scenario (ie, the office rooms) may have on the outcome (ie, the IAP concentrations) were considered specifying the monitored office rooms as units of analysis (subjects) in the measurement repetition for season . Moreover, linear mixed models accounted for the multilevel structure of the sampling design: the buildings were included into the model as random factor (as they were randomly selected in each country) to consider the office room grouping and it was decided if this variable was dropped from the model depending on the Wald test significance level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%