2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(02)00398-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying and assessing uncertainty in hydrological pathways: a novel approach to end member mixing in a Scottish agricultural catchment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
103
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mohanty et al, 1998;van der Velde et al, 2010), dissolved phosphorous (e.g. Stamm et al, 1998;Sinaj et al, 2002) and pesticides (e.g. Zehe and Flühler, 2001) in many agricultural fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mohanty et al, 1998;van der Velde et al, 2010), dissolved phosphorous (e.g. Stamm et al, 1998;Sinaj et al, 2002) and pesticides (e.g. Zehe and Flühler, 2001) in many agricultural fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As almost all model parameters are related to measurable parameters, a sensitivity analysis also provides important information for future field data acquisition to reduce measurement uncertainty and improve the model's reliability. Generally, two kind of sensitivity analysis can be distinguished: a global sensitivity and a local sensitivity analysis (Tiemeijer et al, 2007;Spear and Hornberger, 1980). With local techniques parameter interdependencies are ignored and were found to be unreliable for non-linear relationships between parameters and outputs which are typical for hydrological outputs (Tiemeyer et al, 2007;Muleta and Nicklow, 2005).…”
Section: Parameter Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EMMA assumes that solute concentrations in a stream result from the mixing of two or more flow routes with a known concentration ("endmembers") and it is often used for hydrograph separation into contributions of individual flow routes (e.g. Tiemeyer et al, 2008;Soulsby et al, 2003;van der Velde et al, 2010). Given the uncertainty of fluxes and concentration of the different sources only a combination of EMMA with an uncertainty and sensitivity assessment will yield meaningful estimations of individual flow routes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EMMA has not generally been considered appropriate for N modelling, because it assumes constant solute concentrations that characterise the different sources of water within a catchment. However, some success has been achieved in using nitrate as an end-member over short time periods, for flow separation of storm events (Petry et al, 2002;Soulsby et al, 2003), by identifying differences in nitrate concentration between waters sourced from overland flow, subsurface flow from agricultural field drains and groundwater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the commonly observed characteristics of streamwater N signals is a dilution effect at the peak of the hydrograph (Cooper and Roberts, 1996;Soulsby et al, 2003). This can be explained by the occurrence of overland flow where water is transported very rapidly to a surface stream.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%