Identifying and understanding attitudinal diversity on multi-functional changes in woodlands of the Ukrainian Carpathians

Abstract

This paper advances existing knowledge of stakeholder attitudes towards ecosystem-based forest strategies and management practices in marginalized mountain areas of the Ukrainian Carpathians. The principal research question was to analyse the state of affairs regarding multi-functional changes in upland woodlands, as viewed by relevant stakeholders. An ultimate goal was to assist decision-makers in evaluation (e.g. through stakeholder evaluation using the suggested method) and implementation (through stakeholder engagement) of sustainable policy and management decisions. The Q-method, with the sequential application of its correlation and factor analytical tools, was applied to elucidate a range of existing attitudes (e.g. towards the expansion of woodlands under climate change and other drivers) and the spectrum of sustainability (its ecological, economic and social components) to which they relate. Dominant attitudes of representatives of relevant stakeholder groups towards multi-functional changes in forestry in the Carpathian Mountains were revealed and analysed. Key factors influencing the attitudinal diversity were explained. The results improve our understanding of stakeholder priorities and of commonalities and differences in existing attitudes/perceptions, providing some indication of how the diversity of attitudes towards forestry changes (e.g. integration of woodlands in mountain landscapes) could potentially influence sustainable forestry decisions. At times, entirely opposite attitudes (e.g. of the so-called Conservationists and Productivists attitudinal groups) towards forestry practices and key objectives of forestry in the Carpathian uplands were revealed. However, people put strong emphasis on multi-functional forestry offering a range of benefits to people, the environment and the economy.

Q methodology to determine distinguishing and consensus factors (a case study of university students’ ecoliteracy on disaster risk reduction)

“…It indicates how many variables can explain a factor. The default value of Eigenvalue is set on > 1 (less than 1 is ignored because it cannot construct a factor) [4,18,22]. Therefore, table 1 only shows a factor 1 to 5.…”

“…The final step is interpreting interviews result of participants. The results are verified, disassociated, and communicated to the related parties [18].…”

Enhancing the resilience capacity of sensitive mountain forest ecosystems under environmental change (SENSFOR)

“…It is important to note that envisioning the future and working to transform potential scenarios in science and policy may be seriously limited by the pragmatic constraints of pre-existing science and policy (Nijnik et al 2017).…”

Sensitivity to environmental change of the treeline ecotone and its associated biodiversity in European mountains

“…Changes in biodiversity affect the functioning of ecosystems, and thereby also society through many ecosystem services (Garcia-Ruiz et al 1996, Cardinale et al 2012this Special: Sarkki et al 2017a,b, Kyriazopoulos et al 2017, Fleischer et al 2017, Nijnik et al 2017). …”