2013
DOI: 10.1111/jai.12191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying growth parameters for two endemic species [Capoeta antalyensis (Battalgil, 1943) and Pseudophoxinus antalyae Bogutskaya, 1992] in Duden Creek, Antalya, Turkey

Abstract: It is hypothesized that Capoeta antalyensis (Battalgil, 1943) and Pseudophoxinus antalyae (Bogutskaya, 1992) might display specific growth characteristics that differ from other species of their genus. Age and growth were described for species from Duden Creek (Antalya, Turkey) from February 2008 to January 2009. The length-weight relationship for all individuals were described by the parameters: a = 0.0143 and b = 2.946 for C. antalyensis and a = 0.0084 and b = 3.251 for P. antalyae. The von Bertalanffy grow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Length–weight relationships (LWRs) can be used for estimating the weight corresponding to a given length determining fish condition, convert lengths into biomass, and present growth pattern of fish (Froese, ; Froese, Tsikliras, & Stergiou, ). However, there are only a few studies providing LWRs of Pseudophoxinus species (Ayyıldız, Emre, Yağcı, & Altın, ; Demirci, ; Erk'akan, İnnal, & Özdemir, ; İlhan & Gücer, ; İnnal, ; İnnal, ; İnnal & Özdemir, ; İnnal, Aksu, & Giannetto, ; Koca & Ölmez, ; Yoğurtçuoğlu et al, ). Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the LWRs of 16 species of Pseudophoxinus living in Turkish inland waters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Length–weight relationships (LWRs) can be used for estimating the weight corresponding to a given length determining fish condition, convert lengths into biomass, and present growth pattern of fish (Froese, ; Froese, Tsikliras, & Stergiou, ). However, there are only a few studies providing LWRs of Pseudophoxinus species (Ayyıldız, Emre, Yağcı, & Altın, ; Demirci, ; Erk'akan, İnnal, & Özdemir, ; İlhan & Gücer, ; İnnal, ; İnnal, ; İnnal & Özdemir, ; İnnal, Aksu, & Giannetto, ; Koca & Ölmez, ; Yoğurtçuoğlu et al, ). Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the LWRs of 16 species of Pseudophoxinus living in Turkish inland waters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years the distribution and systematics of Pseudophoxinus in Turkey have undergone numerous taxonomic changes and intensive investigations. The ecology of the Pseudophoxinus genus has been reported in aquatic systems in terms of distribution, growth properties and parasites (Küçük and Ikiz, ; Soylu and Emre, ; Ergene et al., ; Aydoğdu et al., ,b; Innal, , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2014). Pseudophoxinus genusuna ait türlerin büyüme özellikleri ve boy ağırlık ilişkileri üzerine yapılan çalışmalardan (Özel 2005;Innal 2013Innal , 2014…”
unclassified