2014
DOI: 10.1255/jnirs.1127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Hybridisation in Pinus Species Using near Infrared Spectroscopy of Foliage

Abstract: Near infrared (NIR) spectra from foliage of the tropical pine species Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis, P. elliottii var. elliottii and their hybrids have been used to classify the extent of hybridisation for the F 1 and backcross progeny. Comparison of results for F 1 hybrids with simulated hybrids, made from admixtures of pure parent foliage samples, showed increased variation in the NIR spectra of the F 1 hybrids as evidenced by greater scatter in the principal component analysis scores plot. Both partial le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We thus propose to evaluate the efficiency of NIRS to make predictions with G-BLUP (or equivalently, RR-BLUP) using these traits instead of molecular markers. Numerous studies have demonstrated the usefulness of NIRS for barcoding samples and discriminating species or varieties (Bertrand et al 1985;Adedipe et al 2008;Espinoza et al 2012;Fischnaller et al 2012;Abasolo et al 2013;O'Reilly-Wapstra et al 2013;Meder et al 2014;Lang et al 2017) and have thus suggested that NIRS could be considered as a genetic marker (Cruickshank and Munck 2011) Moreover, some studies have shown that NIRS can capture some genetic variability by estimating the heritability of the spectrum and even mapping corresponding quantitative trait loci (QTL, O'Reilly-Wapstra et al 2013;Posada et al 2008;Diepeveen et al 2012;Hein and Chaix 2014). However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have proposed using NIRS to perform "phenomic selection" (PS), which we define as the use of high-throughput phenotyping to obtain numerous variables which can be used as regressors or to estimate kinship in the statistical models classically used in GS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thus propose to evaluate the efficiency of NIRS to make predictions with G-BLUP (or equivalently, RR-BLUP) using these traits instead of molecular markers. Numerous studies have demonstrated the usefulness of NIRS for barcoding samples and discriminating species or varieties (Bertrand et al 1985;Adedipe et al 2008;Espinoza et al 2012;Fischnaller et al 2012;Abasolo et al 2013;O'Reilly-Wapstra et al 2013;Meder et al 2014;Lang et al 2017) and have thus suggested that NIRS could be considered as a genetic marker (Cruickshank and Munck 2011) Moreover, some studies have shown that NIRS can capture some genetic variability by estimating the heritability of the spectrum and even mapping corresponding quantitative trait loci (QTL, O'Reilly-Wapstra et al 2013;Posada et al 2008;Diepeveen et al 2012;Hein and Chaix 2014). However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have proposed using NIRS to perform "phenomic selection" (PS), which we define as the use of high-throughput phenotyping to obtain numerous variables which can be used as regressors or to estimate kinship in the statistical models classically used in GS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visible and near infrared (Vis-NIR) spectroscopy has been widely used in many sectors, including the food, material, and life sciences [7][8][9]. In the field of forestry, many studies have demonstrated its potential to determine components, such as moisture, density, lignin content, and so on; detect wood preservation; and classify species [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Sandak et al applied cluster analysis (CA) and principal component analysis (PCA) to classify powdered samples (fraction < 0.5 mm) and wood samples, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thus propose to evaluate the efficiency of NIRS to make predictions with G-BLUP (or equivalently, RR-BLUP) using these traits instead of molecular markers. Numerous studies have demonstrated the usefulness of NIRS for barcoding samples and discriminating species or varieties (Bertrand et al 1985; Adedipe et al 2008; Espinoza et al 2012; Fischnaller et al 2012; Abasolo et al 2013; O’Reilly-Wapstra et al 2013; Meder et al 2014; Lang et al 2017) and have thus suggested that NIRS could be considered as a genetic marker (Cruickshank and Munck 2011). Moreover, some studies have shown that NIRS can capture some genetic variability by estimating the heritability of absorbances along the spectrum and even mapping corresponding quantitative trait loci (QTL, (Posada et al 2009; Diepeveen et al 2012; O’Reilly-Wapstra et al 2013; Hein and Chaix 2014)).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%