Identifying, reducing, and communicating uncertainty in community science: a focus on alien species

Abstract

Community science (also often referred to as citizen science) provides a unique opportunity to address questions beyond the scope of other research methods whilst simultaneously engaging communities in the scientific process. This leads to broad educational benefits, empowers people, and can increase public awareness of societally relevant issues such as the biodiversity crisis. As such, community science has become a favourable framework for researching alien species where data on the presence, absence, abundance, phenology, and impact of species is important in informing management decisions. However, uncertainties arising at different stages can limit the interpretation of data and lead to projects failing to achieve their intended outcomes. Focusing on alien species centered community science projects, we identified key research questions and the relevant uncertainties that arise during the process of developing the study design, for example, when collecting the data and during the statistical analyses. Additionally, we assessed uncertainties from a linguistic perspective, and how the communication stages among project coordinators, participants and other stakeholders can alter the way in which information may be interpreted. We discuss existing methods for reducing uncertainty and suggest further solutions to improve data reliability. Further, we make suggestions to reduce the uncertainties that emerge at each project step and provide guidance and recommendations that can be readily applied in practice. Reducing uncertainties is essential and necessary to strengthen the scientific and community outcomes of community science, which is of particular importance to ensure the success of projects aimed at detecting novel alien species and monitoring their dynamics across space and time.

Overcoming biodiversity blindness: Secondary data in primary citizen science observations

“…To achieve more accurate and reliable monitoring and interaction data, we need to improve and integrate current methods (Besson et al, 2022;Kühl et al, 2020;van Klink et al, 2022), to better analyse existing data (Probert et al, 2022), and to extract more information from already collected data (Johnston et al, 2022).…”

A general framework to quantify and compare ecological impacts under temporal dynamics

“…This is also relevant when investigating context-dependency of impacts: although between-site differences are important for such research questions, replicating measures for the studied contextvariables improves the quality of the findings. Third, we recommend focusing on probabilistic statements rather than impact estimates themselves whenever possible (Figure 2; see also Probert et al, 2022). Even if estimates about impact magnitudes (I ) or changes ( ) are associated with high uncertainty, it may still be possible to conclude that there is a high probability of a driver d having a non-zero impact (e.g.…”

Eyes on the aliens: citizen science contributes to research, policy and management of biological invasions in Europe

“…To further improve outreach and onboarding of new citizen scientists, and sustained participation, our results suggest that the provision of maps with sightings and the provision of training are important. Future work could also be undertaken to compare the performance of different validation procedures and provide recommendations to new projects to improve data quality (Probert et al 2022).…”