2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11869-019-00753-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying shelter locations and building air intake risk from release of particulate matter in a three-dimensional street canyon via wind tunnel and CFD simulation

Abstract: Note: This file is a pre-print or un-reviewed and un-edited version of a work submitted for publication. The author provides this work publicly under a CC4.0 license: attribution, noncommercial, no derivatives. Any other uses are by expressed written permission only.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A concerning trend is observed: almost half of the reviewed publications either do not comply with the BPGs for the domain dimensions in the flow direction (e.g., [52,[55][56][57][58][59][60], reaching zero distance offsets between the domain boundaries and the outer buildings in [61]), or do not report these important domain parameters (e.g., [16,[62][63][64]). Conversely, there are articles [48,50,[65][66][67][68] where the upstream distance that was used is much higher than the minimum recommendation of 5H, ranging between 14H in [48] and 38H in [68]. The same is true for the downstream distance, which, in papers [15,48,50,[68][69][70][71] ranges from 28H in [69] to 133.3H in [50].…”
Section: Upstream and Downstream Distancesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A concerning trend is observed: almost half of the reviewed publications either do not comply with the BPGs for the domain dimensions in the flow direction (e.g., [52,[55][56][57][58][59][60], reaching zero distance offsets between the domain boundaries and the outer buildings in [61]), or do not report these important domain parameters (e.g., [16,[62][63][64]). Conversely, there are articles [48,50,[65][66][67][68] where the upstream distance that was used is much higher than the minimum recommendation of 5H, ranging between 14H in [48] and 38H in [68]. The same is true for the downstream distance, which, in papers [15,48,50,[68][69][70][71] ranges from 28H in [69] to 133.3H in [50].…”
Section: Upstream and Downstream Distancesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Conversely, there are articles [48,50,[65][66][67][68] where the upstream distance that was used is much higher than the minimum recommendation of 5H, ranging between 14H in [48] and 38H in [68]. The same is true for the downstream distance, which, in papers [15,48,50,[68][69][70][71] ranges from 28H in [69] to 133.3H in [50].…”
Section: Upstream and Downstream Distancesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations