2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying the Best-Fitting Factor Structure of the Experience of Close Relations - Revised in a Scandinavian Example

Abstract: The aim of this study was to enhance the understanding of cultural and sample differences in the assessment of attachment by examining the factor structure of the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R). The ECR-R is a self-report measure of adult romantic attachment dimensions. The present study used a Danish sample with the purpose of addressing limitations in previous studies, such as the lack of diversity in cultural background, restricted sample characteristics, and poorly fitting structure mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The items are distributed in two subscales; attachmentrelated anxiety (i.e., the extent to which people are insecure vs. secure about the availability and responsiveness of close person) and attachment-related avoidance (i.e., the extent to which people are uncomfortable being close to others vs. secure depending on others). More research confirms the improvement of metric characteristics of the ECR-R in relation to the ECR (Esbjørn et al 2015), and the stability of the twofactor structure (Sibley & Liu 2004). Cronbach α reliability coefficient obtained in this study for anxiety subscale was 0.90 and for avoidance subscale was 0.92.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The items are distributed in two subscales; attachmentrelated anxiety (i.e., the extent to which people are insecure vs. secure about the availability and responsiveness of close person) and attachment-related avoidance (i.e., the extent to which people are uncomfortable being close to others vs. secure depending on others). More research confirms the improvement of metric characteristics of the ECR-R in relation to the ECR (Esbjørn et al 2015), and the stability of the twofactor structure (Sibley & Liu 2004). Cronbach α reliability coefficient obtained in this study for anxiety subscale was 0.90 and for avoidance subscale was 0.92.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The ECR-S provides a reliable and valid measure of adult attachment style [ 49 ]. A Danish translation of the ECR-S was used in this study [ 50 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ECR-R was filled out on-line and only individuals with anxiety scores <3.96 were invited to participate. This cutoff was ascertained through averaging anxiety scores from seven studies on the psychometric properties of the ECR-R ( Tsagarakis et al, 2007 ; Alonso-Arbiol et al, 2008 ; Olssøn et al, 2010 ; Holland et al, 2012 ; Busonera et al, 2014 ; Esbjørn et al, 2015 ). To ensure no inadvertent priming of attachment-related thoughts from the ECR-R ( Cassidy et al, 2009 ; Chun et al, 2015 ), 10days were allowed between pre-screen and experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%