IETF Criteria for Evaluating Reliable Multicast Transport and Application Protocols

Mankin, Allison; Romanow, Allyn; Bradner, S.; Paxson, Vern

doi:10.17487/rfc2357

Cited by 90 publications

(50 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the informational IETF standard [14], the authors recommend that each endto-end multicast congestion control should ensure that, for each source-receiver pair, the multicast flow must be TCP-friendly. We believe that this recommendation has been done because there is no network support to guarantee the tcpfriendliness and that it was an anticipated requirement which aims to encourage the fast deployment of multicast in the Internet.…”

Section: Inter-service Fairnessmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

SBQ: A Simple Scheduler for Fair Bandwidth Sharing Between Unicast and Multicast Flows

Filali

Dabbous

2002

From QoS Provisioning to QoS Charging

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. In this paper, we propose a simple scheduler called SBQ (Service-Based Queuing) to share the bandwidth fairly between unicast and multicast flows according to a new definition of fairness referred as the inter-service fairness. We utilize our recently proposed active queue management mechanism MFQ (Multicast Fair Queuing) to fairly share the bandwidth among all competing flows in the multicast queue. The simulation results obtained for very heterogeneous sources and links characteristics suggest that, on the one hand, our scheduler achieves the expected aggregated bandwidth sharing among unicast and multicast service, and on the other hand the multicast flows remain TCP-friendly.

show abstract

Section: Inter-service Fairnessmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The IETF orchestrated a very strong guideline for developing a TCP-friendly multicast congestion control scheme [14] regardless of the number of receivers in the multicast session. It is well-known that multiplicative decrease/linear increase congestion control mechanisms, and in particular TCP, lead to proportional fairness [9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

SBQ: A Simple Scheduler for Fair Bandwidth Sharing Between Unicast and Multicast Flows

Filali

Dabbous

2002

From QoS Provisioning to QoS Charging

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) standards concerning end-to-end congestion control focus either on specific protocols [1] [2] or on the syntax and semantics of communications between the end nodes [3]. Various congestion control mechanisms are developed at transport layer level.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This equation maintains a steady state sending rate to network to avoid the abrupt fluctuations. TFRC sending rate X is a function of packet size which is represented as Equation (2).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Enhanced Queue Management Scheme for Eradicating Congestion of TFRC over Wired Environment

Reddy

Pakanati

Padmavathamma

2017

IJECE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To accomplish increasing real time requirements, user applications have to send different kinds of data with different speeds over the internet. To effectuate the aims of the computer networks, several protocols have been added to TCP/IP protocol suite. Transport layer has to implement emerging techniques to transfer huge amount of data like multimedia streaming. To transmit multimedia applications, one of the suitable congestion control mechanisms in transport layer is TCP Friendly Rate Control Protocol (TFRC). It controls congestion based on its equation. To get more smoothed throughput, intermediate nodes (like Routers. etc.) have to use suitable procedures in all real time situations. To eradicate the level of congestion in the network, we introduce enhanced Holt-Winters equations to RED queue management algorithm and applied to TFRC. The simulation results have shown that this strategy reduces packet loss and increases throughput.

show abstract

“…This document describes a congestion control building block that conforms to RFC 2357 [3]. This document is a product of the IETF RMT WG and follows the general guidelines provided in RFC 3269 [2].…”

Section: Introduction This Document Specifies Wave and Equation Basedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Wave and Equation Based Rate Control (WEBRC) Building Block

Luby¹,

Goyal²

2004

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IETF Criteria for Evaluating Reliable Multicast Transport and Application Protocols

Abstract: Status of this Memo This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Cited by 90 publications

References 8 publications

SBQ: A Simple Scheduler for Fair Bandwidth Sharing Between Unicast and Multicast Flows

SBQ: A Simple Scheduler for Fair Bandwidth Sharing Between Unicast and Multicast Flows

An Enhanced Queue Management Scheme for Eradicating Congestion of TFRC over Wired Environment

Wave and Equation Based Rate Control (WEBRC) Building Block

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About