2021
DOI: 10.3390/e23080942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IIT’s Scientific Counter-Revolution: A Neuroscientific Theory’s Physical and Metaphysical Implications

Abstract: IIT includes commitments about the very nature of physical reality, a fact both highly unusual for an empirical theory within neuroscience, and surprisingly underappreciated within the literature. These commitments are intimately tied to the theory; they are not incidental. This paper demonstrates as much by raising certain objections in a “naive” way, and then exposing how the principled IIT responses would rely upon metaphysical positions. Along the way we draw on the IIT literature for support for these int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TTC does not consider, as a starting point, neuronal activity and its relationship among different regions at a definite moment in time; rather, it stresses the relevance of the temporal dynamics of neuronal activity at different points in time as an intrinsic feature of consciousness [ 21 , 23 , 43 , 44 ]. This temporal dimension can be conceived as an empirical specification of the background conditions that influence the shape of current activity in the cause-effect structure of the PSC predicted by IIT [ 32 , 45 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TTC does not consider, as a starting point, neuronal activity and its relationship among different regions at a definite moment in time; rather, it stresses the relevance of the temporal dynamics of neuronal activity at different points in time as an intrinsic feature of consciousness [ 21 , 23 , 43 , 44 ]. This temporal dimension can be conceived as an empirical specification of the background conditions that influence the shape of current activity in the cause-effect structure of the PSC predicted by IIT [ 32 , 45 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IIT is especially interesting because it aims to explain the phenomenal, subjective character of experience; not its behavioural, computational or functional correlates [5]. However, the consistency of the theory has been critically addressed on several occasions [6][7][8][9][10]. Here, we focus specifically on a metaphysical aspect of the theory's most recent version (IIT 4.0) [11][12][13][14], what we may call its idealistic ontology, and its tension with a kind of realism about the external world that IIT also endorses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not my intent, here, to explore the relation between the epistemology of IIT and its metaphysical assumptions and implications (for a discussion, see(Fallon and Blackmon 2021)). I do not intend to suggest that pandispositionalism is uncontroversial either.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%